A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Comparison of the effects of removable dentures made by 3D printing and traditional casting methods on patients' subjective feelings]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effects of removable dentures created through 3D printing versus traditional casting methods on patients' perceptions and comfort.
  • It involved 80 patients with specific dentition issues, analyzing factors like intraoral tenderness, chewing efficiency, and overall satisfaction after two months of wearing the dentures.
  • Results showed that 3D printed dentures had fewer tender points and higher chewing efficiency, leading to significantly better subjective feelings and satisfaction compared to those made by plaster casting.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare the different effects of removable dentures made by 3D printing and traditional casting methods on patients' subjective feelings.

Methods: A total of 80 patients with dentition defects of Ken's Class Ⅰ and Subclass Ⅱ were selected from the Department of Prosthodontics. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, with removable dentures made by using 3D printing and plaster casting method, respectively. The patients were asked to re-visit 1 week after wearing the dentures to observe and record intraoral mucosal tenderness points. At the same time, mastication efficiency was measured by absorbance method. The patients were followed up for 2 months after wearing dentures, and questionnaires were issued to them to investigate subjective feelings and satisfaction. The subjective feelings of patients included masticatory ability, retention effect, convenience, comfort, speech function and facial appearance. Satisfaction evaluation included three aspects: treatment duration, cost and final outcome. Each aspect of evaluation used a 5-point system, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. The higher the score, the better the patient's subjective feelings or the higher the satisfaction. The data were statistically analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software package.

Results: The tender points in 3D printing group was less than the plaster casting group, while the chewing efficiency of 3D printing group was higher than the plaster casting group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The difference of subjective feeling and satisfaction was also significant between the two groups(P<0.05).

Conclusions: 3D printing to make removable denture has certain advantages in improving the accuracy of removable denture and the comfort of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

removable dentures
12
dentures printing
12
plaster casting
12
subjective feelings
12
effects removable
8
printing traditional
8
traditional casting
8
casting methods
8
methods patients'
8
patients' subjective
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!