Impact of new molecular criteria on diagnosis and survival of adult glioma patients.

The fifth edition WHO classification of Tumors of the Central nervous system (WHO-CNS5) integrated new molecular parameters to refine CNS tumor classification. This study aimed to reclassify a retrospective cohort of adult glioma patients according to WHO-CNS5, and assess if overall survival (OS) correlated with the revised diagnosis. Further, the diagnostic impact of methylation profiling (MP) was evaluated. Adult gliomas diagnosed according to 2016 WHO-CNS (n = 226) were evaluated according to WHO-CNS5 criteria. All patients had diagnostic NGS performed. 29 patients had 850k MP performed due to challenging tumor cases. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank test. 19 patients were reclassified. Specifically, diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma (DAG-G) were reclassified as glioblastoma (n = 15). Shifts to glioblastoma were because of promoter ( ) mutation (n = 9), amplification (n = 2), amplification and mutation (n = 1), and mutation with gain of chromosome 7, but uncertain chromosome 10 status due to lack of NGS coverage (n = 3). Lower grade IDH-mutant astrocytomas were reclassified as astrocytoma IDH-mutant, WHO grade 4 due to homozygous deletion (n = 4). No significant difference in OS was found for reclassified DAG-G in whole group (p = 0.59) and for mutation only (p = 0.44), compared to glioblastoma. MP resulted in revised diagnosis (n = 2), confirmed diagnosis (n = 15) and no match (n = 12). Our study showed similar overall survival for glioblastoma and DAG patients, supporting that isolated mutation may have a prognostic role in IDH-wildtype gliomas. Further, our study suggests MP is useful for confirming the diagnoses in challenging tumors.