Rhinoplasty osteotomes can be sharpened in various ways: professional sharpening or hand sharpening using whetstones or rotary powered devices. To compare the effectiveness of sharpening osteotomes using various sharpening methods with that of professional sharpening as measured by a custom edge tester. We performed repeated serial osteotome impacts on bovine femoral cortical bone. These dull osteotomes were sharpened using preidentified sharpening techniques. Edge morphology was evaluated. Sharpness was tested using a custom mechanical testing platform. Optimized sharpness was achieved with a whetstone sharpening method wherein the osteotome is flipped after every stroke. Seven distinct sharpening methods were tested for sharpness five times each to determine the optimal sharpening method versus professional sharpening (control). The two sharpening methods, 5 (5.51 ± 0.32) and 6 (5.55 ± 0.32), that used this flipping technique were significantly sharper than other methods. Methods 5 ( = 1.0) and 6 ( = 1.0) were the only methods that were not significantly different from control. Single stroke with successively alternating surfaces created the sharpest blades that achieved results similar to professional sharpening.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2022.0123DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

professional sharpening
16
sharpening
12
sharpening methods
12
osteotomes sharpened
8
sharpening method
8
methods
6
developing optimal
4
optimal osteotome
4
osteotome hand-sharpening
4
hand-sharpening method
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Governance and leadership are regarded as the most crucial aspects in delivering quality health care, and yet they are arguably the most complex functions of any health system. The objective of the study was to investigate the structural problems affecting the implementation of the National Health Insurance (NHI) and address the challenges affecting the NHI building blocks. Further objective of the study was to evaluate if there were appropriate controls and accountability measures in leadership and governance to inform the development of a workable model for the implementation of the NHI in South Africa.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To co-design artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical informatics workflows to routinely analyse patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in hospitals.

Methods: The context was public hospitals (n=114) and health services (n=16) in a large state in Australia serving a population of ~5 million. We conducted a participatory action research study with multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, managers, data analysts, consumer representatives and industry professionals (n=16) across three phases: (1) defining the problem, (2) current workflow and co-designing a future workflow and (3) developing proof-of-concept AI-based workflows.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The WHO SAGE vaccine hesitancy working group defined vaccine hesitancy as the delay or refusal of vaccination. Questions about individuals who become vaccinated while hesitant, or remain unvaccinated even though they are not hesitant, are unimaginable when starting from this behaviorally related definition of vaccine hesitancy. More critically, behaviorally related definitions limit the possibilities for vaccine hesitancy research to be translatable into clinical and public health practices that can increase vaccination.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization can prevent cancers, but uptake has been incomplete (and worse with the COVID-19 pandemic). Dental clinicians already screen for oral cancers, many of which are caused by HPV, and could identify vaccination candidates, but this requires a case-finding strategy.

Objective: The purpose of this study was (1) to develop and test a case-finding approach to identify patients who were candidates for HPV vaccinations, (2) to test an HPV vaccination intervention by dental professionals on vaccination uptake.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has sharpened the focus on health care safety and quality, underscoring the importance of using standardized metrics such as the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). In this regard, the ICD-10 cluster Y62-Y69 serves as a proxy assessment of safety and quality in health care systems, allowing researchers to evaluate medical misadventures. Thus far, extensive research and reports support the need for more attention to safety and quality in health care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!