YouTube as a source of information and education on endometriosis.

Medicine (Baltimore)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Published: September 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • Many patients turn to online platforms, especially YouTube, for information about health topics like endometriosis, prompting a study to evaluate the quality and usefulness of these videos for the general public and medical professionals.
  • A search was conducted for popular YouTube videos on endometriosis, resulting in 52 selected videos that amassed over 35 million views, with important metrics like likes, dislikes, and content types recorded for analysis.
  • The study found that videos from medical sources provided significantly better quality information compared to personal experience videos, indicating that YouTube is currently not a reliable source for accurate endometriosis knowledge and highlighting the need for more credible content from healthcare professionals.

Article Abstract

Many patients seek information online, including on social media, regarding various health topics. This study aimed to investigate whether YouTube videos on endometriosis could be a useful source for the general population, surgical trainees, and specialists. A YouTube search was conducted on December 26, 2021, using the search terms "endometriosis," "endometrioma," and "endometriotic cyst." Videos were sorted by view count, and the 100 videos with the highest view counts were chosen. After excluding 48 videos for various reasons, 52 were included in the final analysis. The number of views, duration, likes and dislikes, content type, and source of each video were recorded. We referred to a previous study to evaluate video quality. The 52 videos related to endometriosis had a total of 35,220,141 views (median 233,688, range 48,874-10,452,366). Based on authorship, the videos were categorized into videos uploaded by the medical group and the nonmedical group. The medical group mainly uploaded videos directly related to endometriosis, such as explanations or detailed surgical procedures for endometriosis (26/27, 96%), whereas the nonmedical group mainly uploaded videos about personal experiences and others (24/25, 96%; P <.001). Evaluating the score by each type of content, videos containing personal experiences (median score 6, range 3-10) scored significantly lower than videos containing other content such as explanations of the disease (median score 14, range 7-18; P < .001) and surgical procedures (median score 9, range 5-17; P < .001). Analysis according to the source, the number of views and video power index was significantly higher in the videos uploaded by the nonmedical group (P < .05). YouTube is currently not an appropriate source for patients to gain information on endometriosis. Credible videos with accurate information and clear, high-quality operative clips with proper scientific commentary should be uploaded by medical professionals and medical institutions to critically and rapidly appraise the quality of online video-disseminated information on endometriosis. In addition, advanced filtering using categories by YouTube's staff appears to be necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509122PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030639DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

videos
9
videos endometriosis
8
medical group
8
nonmedical group
8
group uploaded
8
uploaded videos
8
endometriosis
5
youtube source
4
source education
4
education endometriosis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!