A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Tenant-Based Housing Voucher Programs: A Community Guide Systematic Review. | LitMetric

Tenant-Based Housing Voucher Programs: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

J Public Health Manag Pract

Community Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (Drs Finnie, Peng, and Hahn and Ms Cobb), Office of the Associate Director for Science (Dr Truman), National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, & TB Prevention (Dr Williams), and National Center for Environmental Health (Dr Buchanan), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Milano School of Policy, Management, and Environment, Graduate Program in Public and Urban Policy, New School, New York City, New York (Drs Schwartz and Fullilove); Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr Emmons); University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama (Dr Montgomery); US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia (Dr Montgomery); University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Muntaner); US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, District of Columbia (Ms Garrison); Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey (Dr Johnson); Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Jones); and Dignity Health, San Francisco, California (Mr Bravo).

Published: October 2022

Context: Unaffordable or insecure housing is associated with poor health in children and adults. Tenant-based housing voucher programs (voucher programs) limit rent to 30% or less of household income to help households with low income obtain safe and affordable housing.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of voucher programs in improving housing, health, and other health-related outcomes for households with low income.

Design: Community Guide systematic review methods were used to assess intervention effectiveness and threats to validity. An updated systematic search based on a previous Community Guide review was conducted for literature published from 1999 to July 2019 using electronic databases. Reference lists of included studies were also searched.

Eligibility Criteria: Studies were included if they assessed voucher programs in the United States, had concurrent comparison populations, assessed outcomes of interest, were written in English, and published in peer-reviewed journals or government reports.

Main Outcome Measures: Housing quality and stability, neighborhood opportunity (safety and poverty), education, income, employment, physical and mental health, health care use, and risky health behavior.

Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Compared with low-income households not offered vouchers, voucher-using households reported increased housing quality (7.9 percentage points [pct pts]), decreased housing insecurity or homelessness (-22.4 pct pts), and decreased neighborhood poverty (-5.2 pct pts).Adults in voucher-using households had improved health care access and physical and mental health. Female youth experienced better physical and mental health but not male youth. Children who entered the voucher programs under 13 years of age had improved educational attainment, employment, and income in their adulthood; children's gains in these outcomes were inversely related to their age at program entry.

Conclusion: Voucher programs improved health and several health-related outcomes for voucher-using households, particularly young children. Research is still needed to better understand household's experiences and contextual factors that influence achievement of desired outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555591PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001588DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

voucher programs
28
community guide
12
physical mental
12
mental health
12
voucher-using households
12
health
9
tenant-based housing
8
housing voucher
8
guide systematic
8
systematic review
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!