Preclinical Alzheimer Disease and the Electronic Health Record: Balancing Confidentiality and Care.

Neurology

From the Department of Neurology (S.A.G.), Center for Brain/Mind Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (J.H.), the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders (J.G., Shirley Sirivong), University of California Irvine; Department of Neurology (J.G.-R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (G.A.J.), Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington; Memory and Aging Program (W.M.), Butler Hospital; Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry (M.N.), Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Brain Health and Memory Center (Susie Sami), University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center; Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (S.W.), University of Southern California; and University of Pennsylvania (J.K.), Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology, Penn Memory Center.

Published: November 2022

Because information technologies are increasingly used to improve clinical research and care, personal health information (PHI) has wider dissemination than ever before. The 21st Century Cures Act in the United States now requires patient access to many components of the electronic health record (EHR). Although these changes promise to enhance communication and information sharing, they also bring higher risks of unwanted disclosure, both within and outside of health systems. Having preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD), where biological markers of AD are identified before the onset of any symptoms, is sensitive PHI. Because of the melding of ideas between preclinical and "clinical" (symptomatic) AD, unwanted disclosure of preclinical AD status can lead to personal harms of stigma, discrimination, and changes to insurability. At present, preclinical AD is identified mainly in research settings, although the consensus criteria for a clinical diagnosis may soon be established. There is not yet adequate legal protection for the growing number of individuals with preclinical AD. Some PHI generated in preclinical AD trials has clinical significance, necessitating urgent evaluations and longitudinal monitoring in care settings. AD researchers are obligated to both respect the confidentiality of participants' sensitive PHI and facilitate providers' access to necessary information, often requiring disclosure of preclinical AD status. The AD research community must continue to develop ethical, participant-centered practices related to confidentiality and disclosure, with attention to sensitive information in the EHR. These practices will be essential for translation into the clinic and across health systems and society at large.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728033PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201347DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preclinical
8
preclinical alzheimer
8
alzheimer disease
8
electronic health
8
health record
8
unwanted disclosure
8
health systems
8
sensitive phi
8
disclosure preclinical
8
preclinical status
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!