Background: Re-operative cardiac surgery after prior coronary artery bypass grafting( CABG), using in situ graft is a challenge. Technical difficulties regarding this procedure include risks of graft injury and myocardial protection. The conventional strategy involves re-sternotomy, dissection, and temporary occlusion of the in situ graft to prevent cardioplegia washout. However, the problem with this procedure is that injury to the in situ graft can result in catastrophic complications.

Methods: We reviewed 25 redo cases of patients who had prior CABG with patent in situ grafts. The in situ grafts were dissected and clamped in 18 (group C) patients, whereas in 7 (group U) patients, the in situ grafts were not dissected or clamped. All patients underwent re-sternotomy, aortic cross clamping and cardiac arrest with cardioplegia. Besides, myocardial protection was obtained using moderate hypothermia and systemic potassium injection in group U.

Results: There were no injuries to the in situ grafts in either group. The peak creatine kinase-MB values were not significantly different between the two groups. Postoperative ejection fraction was preserved in both groups.

Conclusions: The simplified approach of no-clamping technique yielded safety and effectiveness for myocardial protection in redo cases for patients with prior CABG in the presence of patent in situ grafts.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

situ grafts
20
patent situ
12
situ graft
12
myocardial protection
12
situ
9
cardiac surgery
8
coronary artery
8
artery bypass
8
redo cases
8
cases patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!