Exploring use of a commercial passive sampler in a closed static chamber to measure ammonia volatilization.

Environ Pollut

Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; Smart Farming Technology Research Center, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Published: December 2022

Studies have indicated that up to 47% of total N fertilizer applied in flooded rice fields may be lost to the atmosphere through NH volatilization. The volatilized NH represents monetary loss and contributes to increase in formation of PM in the atmosphere, eutrophication in surface water, and degrades water and soil quality. The NH is also a precursor to NO formation. Thus, it is important to monitor NH volatilization from fertilized and flooded rice fields. Commercially available samplers offer ease of transportation and installation, and thus, may be considered as NH absorbents for the static chamber method. Hence, the objective of this study is to investigate the use of a commercially available NH sampler/absorbent (i.e., Ogawa® passive sampler) for implementation in a static chamber. In this study, forty closed static chambers were used to study two factors (i.e., trapping methods, exposure duration) arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design. The three trapping methods are standard boric acid solution, Ogawa® passive sampler with acid-coated pads and exposed coated pads without casing. The exposure durations are 1 and 4 h. Results suggest that different levels of absorbed NH was obtained for each of the trapping methods. Highest level of NH was trapped by the standard boric acid solution, followed by the exposed acid-coated pads without casing, and finally acid-coated pads with protective casing, given the same exposure duration. The differences in absorbed NH under same conditions does not warrant direct comparison across the different trapping methods. Any three trapping methods can be used for conducting studies to compare multi-treatments using the static chamber method, provided the same trapping method is applied for all chambers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120282DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trapping methods
20
static chamber
16
passive sampler
12
acid-coated pads
12
closed static
8
flooded rice
8
rice fields
8
chamber method
8
ogawa® passive
8
exposure duration
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!