AI Article Synopsis

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment aims for remission, but there's no consensus on the best index for measuring disease activity in clinical settings.
  • A study analyzed data from 1116 patients to compare different RA activity indices (DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, CDAI) against the ACR/EULAR remission criteria using various statistical methods.
  • Results indicated that CDAI and SDAI were superior for assessing remission compared to other indices, as they demonstrated higher sensitivity, specificity, and minimal residual activity, making CDAI particularly practical for daily use.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices have become handy tools in daily clinical practice and crucial in defining remission or low disease activity, the main target of the RA treatment. However, there is no definition of the best index to assess disease activity in clinical practice.

Objectives: To compare the residual activity among the indices with the ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean method) to identify the most feasible for assessing remission in daily practice, also considering correlation and concordance, sensibility, and specificity.

Patients And Methods: We selected 1116 patients with established RA from the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database-REAL. The composite disease activity indices-DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI-and their components were compared to the Boolean method to identify residual activity using binomial regression. The indices were analyzed for correlation and agreement using the Spearman index and weighted kappa. The chi-square test evaluated sensibility and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method.

Results: DAS28-CRP overestimated remission and confirmed higher residual activity than SDAI and CDAI. The indices showed good correlation and agreement, with a better relationship between SDAI and CDAI (k:0,88). CDAI and SDAI showed higher sensitivity and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. CDAI was performed in 99% of patients, while DAS28 and SDAI were completed in approximately 85%.

Conclusions: Although all composite indices of activity can be used in clinical practice and showed good agreement, CDAI and SDAI have better performance in evaluating remission based on the Boolean method, showing less residual activity and higher sensibility and specificity. In addition, CDAI seems to be more feasible for disease activity evaluation in daily clinical practice, especially in developing countries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521837PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273789PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disease activity
24
residual activity
20
boolean method
16
rheumatoid arthritis
12
composite disease
12
activity
12
activity indices
12
clinical practice
12
remission based
12
based boolean
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!