The authors argue that their target is orthogonal to the realism and instrumentalist debate. I argue that it is born directly from it. While the distinction is helpful in illuminating how some ontological commitments demand a theory of implementation, it's less clear whether different views cleanly map onto the epistemic and metaphysical uses defined in the paper.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22000255 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!