Background: Maintenance treatment following efficient chemotherapy can improve the treatment outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there are no studies for identifying the prognostic factors for patients who could benefit from capecitabine maintenance. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognosis and risk factors of capecitabine maintenance therapy and analysed the circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) markers that may be related to the treatment response.
Methods: This study recruited 482 consecutive patients with MBC who achieved clinical benefit from capecitabine-based chemotherapy from 2011 to 2019. A total of 256 patients received subsequent capecitabine maintenance therapy. The baseline clinical factors included age at diagnosis, menopause, neoadjuvant therapy, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and subtypes, prior treatment lines, and prior capecitabine-based treatment response. Treatment outcome (progression-free survival, PFS) was assessed by imaging tools according to RSCIST 1.1 standard during the first two treatment cycles and every 3 weeks thereafter. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to analysethe association between capecitabine maintenance treatment and prognosis.
Results: The median PFS of patients receiving capecitabine maintenance treatment was 21.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.1-36.3 months]. Capecitabine maintenance showed similar effects as endocrine maintenance or anti-HER2 therapy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive or HER2-positive patients, with adjusted HR of 1.17 (95% CI: 0.81-1.71, P=0.40). In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), capecitabine maintenance showed a marginal benefit in PFS. Compared to late-line (≥2) capecitabine maintenance, first-line capecitabine maintenance significantly prolonged median PFS. Compared to other HR/HER2 subtypes, patients with HR-positive and HER2-positive subtypes significantly benefited from capecitabine maintenance treatment. Analysis of ctDNA revealed that among patients receiving capecitabine maintenance, aberrations were concentrated in patients with short PFS.
Conclusions: Capecitabine maintenance treatment is associated with longer PFS in patients with MBC, especially those receiving first-line capecitabine-based chemotherapy and those with HR positivity/HER2 positivity. aberrations may be responsible for the poor response to capecitabine maintenance treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511179 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3828 | DOI Listing |
Signal Transduct Target Ther
December 2024
Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
This phase 2/3 trial (NCT04856787) assessed the efficacy and safety of SHR-1701, a bifunctional protein targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β, in combination with BP102 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) and XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this phase 2 study, a total of 62 patients with untreated, histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma and no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received SHR-1701 (30 mg/kg), bevacizumab (7.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSignal Transduct Target Ther
December 2024
Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, PR China.
Previous studies showed encouraging efficacy of alternating FOLFOX/FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase 2 trial (NCT04324476) aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of alternating modified CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin)/modified CAPIRI (capecitabine and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab (anti-VEGF-A antibody) in untreated unresectable mCRC. Induction treatment included capecitabine 1000 mg/m bid D2-8 and D16-22, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m D1, irinotecan 150 mg/m D15, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg D1 and 15 for 28-day cycles (up to six cycles).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSignal Transduct Target Ther
December 2024
Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lancet Oncol
December 2024
Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. Electronic address:
Transl Oncol
December 2024
Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, No.10 Changjiang Zhi Road, Daping Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400042, China; Department of Oncology, Chongqing University Qianjiang Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 409099, China. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!