Background: Bleeding in people with hemophilia A can be life threatening, and intra-articular bleeds can result in joint damage. Most clinical studies focus on treated bleeds, while bleeds not treated with coagulation factor(s) (untreated bleeds) are underreported.
Objectives: We assessed the incidence of untreated bleeds during a noninterventional study (NIS) wherein people with hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors, were managed according to standard practice.
Patients/methods: Using the Bleed and Medication Questionnaire, we prospectively collected data from three cohorts: Cohort A, adults/adolescents (age ≥12 years) with FVIII inhibitors; Cohort B, children (aged <12 years) with FVIII inhibitors; Cohort C, adults/adolescents without FVIII inhibitors. Untreated bleeds were analyzed for site, frequency, and etiology of bleeding and compared with those during emicizumab prophylaxis in the same individuals after transferring to a Phase III HAVEN trial.
Results: In the 221 participants enrolled in the NIS (Cohort A, = 103; Cohort B, = 24; Cohort C, = 94), the incidence of untreated bleeds was approximately 40% of all bleeds in people with FVIII inhibitors and 26.2% in adolescents/adults without inhibitors. Approximately 70% of treated bleeds and approximately 54% of untreated bleeds in adults/adolescents were in joints. Untreated joint bleeds were less common (7.1%) in children. Overall, intra-individual comparisons showed reduced treated/untreated bleeds following transition from standard to emicizumab prophylaxis.
Conclusion: A significant proportion of bleeding events are untreated in people with hemophilia A. There is a need to further understand why bleeds remain untreated and to capture such events in clinical studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468791 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12782 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!