Background/objectives: With the increasing popularity and saliency of social media, there is a pressing need to identify whether exposure to such content can affect road rule compliance, especially given that social media has been found to influence other risky behaviours. This systematic review (conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines) summarised existing evidence concerning: (a) the nature of driving-related content on social media and (b) whether such content can influence attitudes and subsequent driving behaviour.
Methods: Peer-reviewed articles written in English, that explored social media content in relation to road safety or driving behaviours (e.g., speeding, tailgating, distraction, impaired driving, and seatbelt use), were eligible for review. Searches were conducted via SCOPUS, PUBMED, ProQuest and TRID in June 2021.
Results/discussion: A total of 8 studies met the requirements for this study, resulting in three key findings. First, it was found that very few studies have explored the type and extent of driving-related content on social media, and the small collection of existing research has focused solely on YouTube and Twitter. Second, whilst the nature of driving-related content on social media varies substantially across studies, a body of content exists that promotes or encourages risky driving behaviour or road rule violations. Third, and despite the array of available online content, there is a paucity of research illuminating the impact of social media messages on attitudes towards, and behaviours linked to road safety. This review highlights the need for research to keep pace with the rapidly changing nature of social media (not least the impacts upon human behaviour) and outlines pathways to increase current scientific understanding.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518855 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0275335 | PLOS |
BMJ Open
March 2025
Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
Objectives: To explore husbands' views on breast cancer screening, risk-based screening and their role in influencing their wives' health-seeking behaviours.
Design: Qualitative focus group discussion (FGD) supplemented by quantitative data from a cohort study using a structured questionnaire.
Setting: This study was conducted in a community-based setting, with participants recruited online through non-profit organisations via social media and email.
BMJ Open
March 2025
Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Luton, UK.
Objectives: To explore the barriers to conversations about deceased organ donation among adults living in the UK.
Design: Systematic review with narrative synthesis.
Data Sources: PubMed, MEDline via OVID, APA PsycInfo via EBSCO, Web of Science via Clarivate and Scopus via Elsevier, covering studies that were published between January 2006 and December 2023.
BMJ Open
March 2025
Division of Paediatric Medicine and Paediatric Outcomes Research Team (PORT), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Objectives: Authentic patient and family engagement in child health research is defined as researchers working in partnership with patients and families on all aspects of the research process, including refining the research question, tailoring the intervention, devising study procedures and disseminating study findings. While there is good evidence of a positive impact of patient engagement on the research process, on research teams and on patient partners, there are few empirical data on the impact of patient and family engagement on research quality and dissemination. We conducted a systematic review to compare research quality and dissemination metrics for paediatric randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that engaged patients and families in the research process with trials that did not.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAddict Behav
March 2025
Department of Epidemiology, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Science, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, United States.
Purpose: Social media use in younger people has shown mixed associations with mental health. We hypothesized that communication types during social media use might alter the relationship between problematic social media use (PSMU) and anxiety over time. We aimed to identify how four dimensions of communication influence the link between PSMU and anxiety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Drug Policy
March 2025
Department of Social Work, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
This study examines how social media platforms shape drug policy advocacy by analyzing stakeholder engagement surrounding supervised consumption sites in New York City. While research has explored organizational use of social media for advocacy, less attention has focused on patterns of civic engagement and dialogue. Analyzing messages and comments from two opposing organizations-OnPoint NYC and Harlem East Block Association-over 24 months (2022-2023), we investigate whether social media-based drug policy advocacy creates public spheres for diverse dialogue or echo chambers of like-minded individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!