A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Mechanical micromodeling of stress-shielding at the bone-implant interphase under shear loading. | LitMetric

Mechanical micromodeling of stress-shielding at the bone-implant interphase under shear loading.

Med Biol Eng Comput

CNRS, Univ Paris Est Creteil, Univ Gustave Eiffel, UMR 8208, MSME, F-94010, Créteil, France.

Published: November 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • Inserting a titanium implant can change how the bone is stress-loaded, possibly leading to bone loss due to stress-shielding effects.
  • A two-dimensional finite element model was created to study the bone-implant interaction and how factors like the bone-implant contact ratio, material properties, and implant roughness influence stress distribution.
  • The findings suggest that using implant materials with similar mechanical properties to bone can create a more uniform stress field, potentially reducing negative effects associated with stress-shielding.

Article Abstract

Inserting a titanium implant in the bone tissue may modify its physiological loading and therefore cause bone resorption, via a phenomenon called stress-shielding. The local stress field around the bone-implant interphase (BII) created under shear loading may be influenced by different parameters such as the bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio, the bone Young's modulus, the implant roughness and the implant material. A 2-D finite element model was developed to model the BII and evaluate the impact of the aforementioned parameters. The implant roughness was described by a sinusoidal function (height 2Δ, wavelength λ), and different values of the BIC ratio were simulated. A heterogeneous distribution of the maximum shear stress was evidenced in the periprosthetic bone tissue, with high interfacial stress for low BIC ratios and low implant roughness and underloaded regions near the roughness valleys. Both phenomena may lead to stress-shielding-related effects, which were concentrated within a distance lower than 0.8λ from the implant surface. Choosing an implant material with mechanical properties matching those of bone tissue leads to a homogenized shear stress field and could help to prevent stress-shielding effects. Finally, the equivalent shear modulus of the BII was derived to replace its complex behavior with a simpler analytical model in future studies. Schematic illustrations of the 2-D finite element model used in the present study and spatial variation of the maximal shear stress in the periprosthetic bone tissue for different implant roughness and bone-implant contact ratios.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02657-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone tissue
16
implant roughness
16
shear stress
12
bone-implant interphase
8
shear loading
8
implant
8
stress field
8
bone-implant contact
8
bic ratio
8
implant material
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!