Validation of ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for Gestational Age at Birth.

Epidemiology

From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Published: January 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the validity of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for gestational age in live births using data from California, covering over 1.8 million births from 2016 to 2019.
  • The research compared gestational age recorded in patient discharge data with obstetric estimates on birth certificates and found a very high concordance correlation and minimal mean difference in measurements.
  • The results indicated that the ICD-10-CM codes demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for various gestational age categories, suggesting they are reliable for use in perinatal research and quality improvement.

Article Abstract

Background: The International Classification of Diseases , 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) introduced diagnosis codes for week of gestation. Our objective was to assess the validity of these codes among live births, which could have major utility in perinatal research and quality improvement.

Methods: We used linked birth certificate and patient discharge data from births in California during 2016-2019 (N = 1,843,992). We identified gestational age using Z3A.xx ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes in birthing patient discharge data and compared it with the gold standard of obstetric estimate, as recorded on the birth certificate. We further assessed sensitivity and specificity of gestational age categories (≥37 weeks, <37 weeks, <32 weeks, <28 weeks), given these categories are frequently of interest, and evaluated differences in validity of preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation) by patient characteristics.

Results: One-million seven-hundred seventy-thousand one-hundred three patients had a gestational age recorded in patient discharge and birth certificate data. When comparing gestational age in patient discharge data with birth certificate data, the concordance correlation coefficient was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96, 0.96) and the mean difference between the two measurements was 0.047 weeks (95% CI = 0.046, 0.047 weeks). Ninety-five percent of the differences between the two measurements were between -1.00 week and +1.09 weeks. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.94 to 1.00 for all gestational age categories and were 0.94 to 1.00 for preterm birth across sociodemographic groups.

Conclusions: We found week-specific gestational age at delivery ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes in patient discharge data to have high validity when compared with the best obstetric estimate on the birth certificate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588291PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001557DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnosis codes
12
gestational age
12
icd-10-cm diagnosis
8
birth certificate
8
patient discharge
8
discharge data
8
validation icd-10-cm
4
codes
4
codes gestational
4
age birth
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!