A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reproducibility of [18F]FDG PET/CT liver SUV as reference or normalisation factor. | LitMetric

Introduction: Although visual and quantitative assessments of [18F]FDG PET/CT studies typically rely on liver uptake value as a reference or normalisation factor, consensus or consistency in measuring [18F]FDG uptake is lacking. Therefore, we evaluate the variation of several liver standardised uptake value (SUV) measurements in lymphoma [18F]FDG PET/CT studies using different uptake metrics.

Methods: PET/CT scans from 34 lymphoma patients were used to calculate SUVmax, SUVpeak and SUVmean as a function of (1) volume-of-interest (VOI) size, (2) location, (3) imaging time point and (4) as a function of total metabolic tumour volume (MTV). The impact of reconstruction protocol on liver uptake is studied on 15 baseline lymphoma patient scans. The effect of noise on liver SUV was assessed using full and 25% count images of 15 lymphoma scans.

Results: Generally, SUVmax and SUVpeak were 38% and 16% higher compared to SUVmean. SUVmax and SUVpeak increased up to 31% and 15% with VOI size while SUVmean remained unchanged with the lowest variability for the largest VOI size. Liver uptake metrics were not affected by VOI location. Compared to baseline, liver uptake metrics were 15-18% and 9-18% higher at interim and EoT PET, respectively. SUV decreased with larger total MTVs. SUVmax and SUVpeak were affected by reconstruction protocol up to 62%. SUVmax and SUVpeak moved 22% and 11% upward between full and 25% count images.

Conclusion: SUVmean was most robust against VOI size, location, reconstruction protocol and image noise level, and is thus the most reproducible metric for liver uptake. The commonly recommended 3 cm diameter spherical VOI-based SUVmean values were only slightly more variable than those seen with larger VOI sizes and are sufficient for SUVmean measurements in future studies.

Trial Registration: EudraCT: 2006-005,174-42, 01-08-2008.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816285PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05977-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver uptake
20
suvmax suvpeak
20
voi size
16
[18f]fdg pet/ct
12
reconstruction protocol
12
liver
8
liver suv
8
reference normalisation
8
normalisation factor
8
pet/ct studies
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!