AI Article Synopsis

  • Current guidelines advise against screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) due to the risk of unnecessary interventions, unlike the strong recommendation for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
  • A literature analysis reveals that patients with AsxCS are at a high risk for future cardiovascular issues, yet universal screening is not advisable.
  • Selective screening for high-risk individuals could be beneficial, focusing on risk factor management and medical therapy to prevent future cardiovascular events rather than identifying candidates for surgery.

Article Abstract

Background: Current guidelines do not recommend screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS). The rationale behind this recommendation is that detection of AsxCS may lead to an unnecessary carotid intervention. In contrast, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms is strongly recommended.

Methods: A critical analysis of the literature was performed to evaluate the implications of detecting AsxCS.

Results: Patients with AsxCS are at high risk for future stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death. Population-wide screening for AsxCS should not be recommended. Additionally, screening of high-risk individuals for AsxCS with the purpose of identifying candidates for a carotid intervention is inappropriate. Instead, selective screening for AsxCS should be considered and should be viewed as an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and future cardiovascular events for the timely initiation of intensive medical therapy and risk factor modification.

Conclusions: Although mass screening should not be recommended, there are several arguments suggesting that selective screening for AsxCS should be considered. The rationale supporting such selective screening is to optimize risk factor control and to initiate intensive medical therapy for prevention of future cardiovascular events, rather than to identify candidates for an intervention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.045DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening asxcs
12
selective screening
12
screening
9
guidelines recommend
8
recommend screening
8
screening abdominal
8
abdominal aortic
8
aortic aneurysms
8
asymptomatic carotid
8
carotid intervention
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Two of the main reasons recent guidelines do not recommend routine population-wide screening programs for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) is that screening could lead to an increase of carotid revascularization procedures and that such mass screening programs may not be cost-effective. Nevertheless, selective screening for AsxCS could have several benefits. This article presents the rationale for such a program.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Despite the publication of various national/international guidelines, several questions concerning the management of patients with asymptomatic (AsxCS) and symptomatic (SxCS) carotid stenosis remain unanswered. The aim of this international, multi-specialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document was to address these issues to help clinicians make decisions when guidelines are unclear.

Methods: Fourteen controversial topics were identified.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A recent update was made about how to manage patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS), which means they have a narrow artery but don’t show symptoms.
  • Researchers looked at studies until August 2023 to learn about new treatments and techniques for these patients.
  • It's important to provide medical treatment to all patients, but some with specific risks may need surgery, and decisions should be based on individual needs and situations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Current guidelines advise against screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) due to the risk of unnecessary interventions, unlike the strong recommendation for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
  • A literature analysis reveals that patients with AsxCS are at a high risk for future cardiovascular issues, yet universal screening is not advisable.
  • Selective screening for high-risk individuals could be beneficial, focusing on risk factor management and medical therapy to prevent future cardiovascular events rather than identifying candidates for surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Benefits and drawbacks of statins and non-statin lipid lowering agents in carotid artery disease.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis

September 2022

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London Medical School, University College London (UCL), London, UK.

Article Synopsis
  • International guidelines recommend using statins, alone or with other medications, to lower LDL cholesterol in patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis, as it significantly reduces risks of stroke and cardiovascular events.
  • The overview evaluates the effectiveness of various lipid-lowering agents, emphasizing that statins and PCSK9 inhibitors offer substantial benefits like stabilizing carotid plaques and lowering stroke rates, while non-statin options like ezetimibe and fibrates also help but to a lesser extent.
  • Despite potential side effects, the advantages of lowering LDL cholesterol for these patients outweigh the risks, leading to a recommendation for high-dose statin therapy for all individuals, regardless of their baseline LDL levels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!