A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Development and validation of a deep learning model for survival prognosis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. | LitMetric

Purpose: We aimed to develop a deep learning-based approach to evaluate both time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) prognosis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treatment-naïve patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compare the approach's performance with those of radiomics and clinical models.

Methods: EfficientNetV2 was used to build a prognosis model for treatment-naïve patients with HCC. Data of 414 intermediate-stage HCC patients from one participant center were collected to construct the training and validation datasets (70%:30%) for TTP prognosis, while data of 129 intermediate-stage HCC patients from another participant center were collected as the test dataset for both TTP and OS prognosis. Three radiomics and three clinical models were then constructed for comparison.

Results: Patients with EfficientNetV2-based model score ≤ 0.5 had better TTP than those with higher scores (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.32, 95%CI: 0.22-0.46, P < 0.0001; HR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.20-0.41, P < 0.0001; and HR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.36-0.88, P = 0.005 in the training, validation, and test datasets, respectively). Patients with model score ≤ 0.5 had better OS (38.8 months vs 20.9 months, HR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.37-0.90, P = 0.008). Compared with the radiomics (intra-tumoral and peri-tumoral) and three clinical models, the EfficientNetV2-based model showed better survival prognosis for TACE (P < 0.05) in the test dataset.

Conclusions: The EfficientNetV2-based model enables assessment of both TTP and OS prognosis of TACE in treatment-naïve, intermediate-stage HCC. Patients with lower scores will benefit from TACE. The model can potentially be used by clinicians to improve decision making regarding TACE treatment choices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110527DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

survival prognosis
8
prognosis transcatheter
8
transcatheter arterial
8
arterial chemoembolization
8
patients intermediate-stage
8
intermediate-stage hepatocellular
8
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
treatment-naïve patients
8
intermediate-stage hcc
8
hcc patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!