Perception of higher frequency of daily hot flashes in 50-year-old women today: a study of trends over time during 48 years in the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine if there are any differences in the prevalence of daily hot flashes in 50-year-old women in a longitudinal perspective (from 1968 to 2017).

Methods: Cohort comparisons of four population-based samples of 50-year-old women born in 1918, 1930 (earlier-born cohorts), 1954, and 1966 (later-born cohorts) from the Prospective Population Study of Women in Gothenburg examined in 1968-1969, 1980-1981, 2004-2005, and 2016-2017. Questions about frequency of hot flashes have been formulated in the same way throughout all follow-up examinations. Changes between four generations of 50-year-old women were studied.

Results: In the unadjusted model, we found an increased prevalence of daily hot flashes in 50-year-old women born in 1954 and 1966 compared with 50-year-old women born in 1918 and 1930 (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-2.22). When considering potential predictors for daily hot flashes (smoking, perceived level of high stress, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, hormone therapy, and hormonal contraceptives) in the adjusted model, there was a notable difference; odds ratio increases from 1.74 to 1.92 (95% confidence interval, 1.46-2.52). Smoking frequency was substantially lower in the later-born cohorts, 39% compared with 17%.

Conclusions: In this prospective longitudinal study of 50-year-old women, we found nearly twice as high odds of reporting daily hot flashes in the later-born women compared with earlier-born. When controlling for potential predictors, there was still an obvious difference, which cannot be explained in our study. These findings have not earlier been described, and there is a need for further longitudinal population studies investigating the prevalence of hot flashes over time. Moreover, additional research is required exploring the underlying mechanism of hot flashes, as well as studies that take into account potential risk factors in the environment and societal development over time, that is, impacts of endocrine-disrupting chemicals changes in lifestyle, environmental, and dietary factors, as well as working conditions.