Purpose: To find out the simple relationship between Total Reference Air Kerma (TRAK) and various isodose volumes. Calculated isodose volumes were compared with experimental data for revised Manchester and International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements (ICRU)-89 Point A-based treatment plans. The accuracy of the formula was compared with the results of other relationships available in the literature.
Materials And Methods: Dosimetric data from 62 intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) treatment plans of 31 patients with cervical cancer were studied. Each patient had treatment plans normalized to revised Manchester and ICRU-89 Points A (A and A). For each treatment plan, TRAK values, V V, V, and V were obtained. The modeling curve was plotted between Isodose volume (V) and the ratio of d/TRAK obtained from A plans to get a mathematical relation. The results of this formula were compared with the experimental data and outcomes of other formulas available in the literature. A paired-sample t-test was performed to assess the statistical significance.
Results: In the case of revised Manchester-based A normalization plans, the mean isodose volume of V, V, V and V were 285.98 ± 32.3 cm, 101.96 ± 10.63 cm, 52.71 ± 4.72 cm, and 31.44 ± 2.33 cm respectively. Likewise, for ICRU-89 based A normalization plans, the mean isodose volumes of V, V, V and V were 304.11 ± 26.17 cm, 108.88 ± 8.29 cm, 56.62 ± 3.69 cm and 34 ± 2.23 cm respectively. The mean difference was significant. The Mathematical relationship developed was [INLINE:1]. No correlation was found between TRAK and D,D for organs at risk.
Conclusions: The developed formula calculated isodose volumes within the accuracy of ± 3% in ICBT plans.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_47_21 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!