The potential for pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers to improve the efficiency of biosimilar product development and regulatory approval formed the premise for the virtual workshop Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers for Biosimilar Development and Approval hosted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Duke Margolis, September 2021. Although the possibility of PD biomarkers replacing the to-date routine comparative phase III confirmatory study currently expected by the FDA was discussed, the motivation and feasibility for biosimilar sponsors developing such markers and the regulatory risks entailed largely were not. Even more fundamental is the already established greater comparative value of the pharmacokinetic (PK) study as the most sensitive clinical assay for detecting subtle differences between two products. Consequently, the comparative analytical assessment and the head-to-head PKs will have already answered the core questions as to the biosimilarity of the candidate product to its reference. No further actionable information is obtained with either a PD study or a comparative clinical phase III study even as they may provide some reassurance of what is already known. When a suitable PD biomarker is available for the originator reference product they have already been used for biosimilar development. We must carefully consider the core requirements and timelines inherent in biosimilar development and how they occur in parallel rather than in the series we see for originator products. In order to improve the efficiency of biosimilar development, we need to ask the right questions based on a full understanding of how biosimilars have been developed to date and can be in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092046PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2753DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biosimilar development
20
biomarkers biosimilar
8
pharmacodynamic biomarkers
8
improve efficiency
8
efficiency biosimilar
8
phase iii
8
biosimilar
7
development
6
role biomarkers
4
development answer
4

Similar Publications

mRNA technology can replace the expensive recombinant technology for every type of protein, making biological drugs more affordable. It can also expedite the entry of new biological drugs, and copies of approved mRNA products can be treated as generic or biosimilar products due to their chemical nature. The introduction of hundreds of new protein drugs have been blocked due to the high cost of recombinant development.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Cost-Effective and Robust Cell-Based Bioassay Method for Evaluating the Bioactivity of Trastuzumab-like Antibodies.

Biomedicines

December 2024

National Institute of Biologicals, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India, A-32, Sector-62, Noida 201309, UP, India.

Trastuzumab is an effective therapeutic intervention for treating HER2-positive breast cancers. The cost-effectiveness, global demand, and patent expiration of trastuzumab have led to the inflow of its biosimilars in the global market. With the rise of biosimilars in the biopharmaceutical market, it has become crucial to ensure that the biosimilar is at par with the original monoclonal antibody (mAb)in terms of efficacy, safety, and quality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mechanism of low molecular weight impurity formation in an IgG1 monoclonal antibody formulation.

J Pharm Sci

January 2025

Formulation and Drug Product Development, Biologics, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address:

Formulation robustness study was performed for a biosimilar monoclonal antibody (IgG1) manufactured at Dr. Reddy's Laboratory, where the pH and concentration level of excipients in the drug product formulation were systematically varied from the target formulation. It was observed that the IgG1 formulation having relatively low pH and high citrate (buffer salt) concentration were predisposed to the formation of low molecular weight impurities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Global harmonization of biosimilar developmental requirements will facilitate development leading to increased patient and societal benefits. However, there are several technical and regulatory hurdles that must be addressed to harmonize the regulatory requirements in different countries and regions. At times, there is a requirement for use of locally sourced reference product, forcing biosimilar developers to repeat analytical or clinical comparability studies against reference product batches sourced from within a given country.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: SB17 is being developed as a biosimilar to ustekinumab reference product (RP), a human monoclonal antibody (IgG1 kappa immunoglobulin) that binds to the common p40 subunit of cytokines interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-12. Binding to this subunit prevents interaction with their receptor, resulting in modulation in the immune system responses that play a key role in inflammatory disease.

Objective: The objective of this study was to demonstrate structural, physicochemical, and biological similarity between ustekinumab RP and SB17 using various state-of-the-art analytical methods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!