A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Trends in Utilization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stroke Patients With Cardiac Rhythm Devices. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • MRI is generally safe for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), but those with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA) have lower MRI usage compared to those without devices.
  • A study analyzed MRI utilization trends from 2012 to 2019 and found that while usage for CIED patients increased from 3% to 20%, it still lags significantly behind the 66% usage rate for non-CIED patients after a 2018 CMS coverage change.
  • The 2018 CMS policy update led to a 4.2% increase in MRI usage for CIED patients, but they are still much less likely to receive MRI scans

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is safe for most patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA) who have CIEDs may undergo MRI less frequently than patients without devices. We assessed contemporary use of MRI for patients with AIS/TIA and the effect of a recent coverage revision by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on MRI utilization.

Methods: Using Optum claims data from January 2012 to June 2019, we performed an interrupted time series analysis of MRI utilization during AIS/TIA hospitalizations with the April 2018 CMS coverage revision serving as the intervention. For patients treated after the coverage revision, we used multivariable logistic regression to determine the association between lack of CIED and MRI utilization for AIS/TIA.

Results: We identified 417,899 patient hospitalizations for AIS/TIA, of which 30,425 (7%) had a CIED present (CIED vs non-CIED patients: age 77.6 ± 9.8 vs 72.7 ± 12.3 years; 45.5% vs 54.3% female). From 2012 to 2019, annual MRI utilization increased from 3% to 20% for CIED patients and 58% to 66% for non-CIED patients. The CMS coverage revision was associated with a 4.2% absolute additional increase in MRI utilization for CIED patients. Non-CIED patients treated after the CMS coverage revision were substantially more likely than CIED patients to undergo MRI (adjusted OR 6.7, 95% CI: 6.3-7.1, P<.001).

Conclusions: MRI utilization has increased for stroke patients with CIEDs but remains far lower than in similar patients without devices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485690PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19418744221115004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coverage revision
20
mri utilization
16
patients
12
cms coverage
12
non-cied patients
12
cied patients
12
mri
9
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
undergo mri
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!