One of the problems that make it difficult to solve the mystery of the origin of life is determining how life emerged in chemically complex messy environments on primitive Earth. In this article, the "chemically complex messy environments" that are focused on are a mixed state of various organic compounds produced via prebiotic means and accumulated on primitive earth. The five factors described below are thought to have contributed to opening the way for the emergence of life: (1) A characteristic inherent in [GADV]-amino acids, which are easily produced via prebiotic means. [GADV] stands for four amino acids, Gly [G], Ala [A], Asp [D] and Val [V], which are indicated by a one-letter symbol. (2) The protein 0th-order structure or a [GADV]-amino acid composition generating water-soluble globular protein with some flexibility, which can be produced even by the random joining of [GADV]-amino acids. (3) The formation of versatile [GADV]-microspheres, which can grow, divide and proliferate even without a genetic system, was the emergence of proto-life. (4) The [GADV]-microspheres with a higher proliferation ability than others were able to be selected. Proto-Darwin evolution made it possible to proceed forward to the creation of a core life system composed of the (GNC) gene, anticodon stem-loop tRNA or AntiC-SL tRNA (GNC genetic code), and [GADV]-protein. (5) Eventually, the first genuine life with a core life system emerged. Thus, the formation processes of [GADV]-protein and the (GNC) gene in chemically complex messy environments were the steps to the emergence of genuine life.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503616 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12091319 | DOI Listing |
Ann Epidemiol
December 2024
NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Healthy Housing, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Housing is an often overlooked yet fundamental social determinant of health. Like other social epidemiology exposures, housing faces a tension between the promise of modern causal inference methods and the messy reality of complex social processes and reliance on observational data. We use examples from over a decade of research to illustrate some of the key challenges in undertaking causally focused healthy housing research and demonstrate approaches that have been applied to address these challenges.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
December 2024
Smell and Taste Clinic, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
This study offers insights into the complex relationship between chemical species constituting air pollution and chemosensory function. We examined the relationship between chemical species known to contribute to air pollution and assault human health and chemosensory sensitivity. Chemosensory sensitivity data was retrieved from a large-scale study involving 711 urban-dwelling participants inhabiting 10 different regions of the globe.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTher Innov Regul Sci
December 2024
The Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, USA.
A Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) plays a pivotal role in monitoring participant safety and efficacy and overseeing the integrity of clinical trials. DMCs accomplish this mission by periodically reviewing accumulating data to assess benefits and harms of interventions in ongoing studies and making subsequent recommendations regarding future clinical trial conduct to the trial sponsor. Reports summarizing data from the clinical trial are prepared for the DMC by statistical and data analysis centers to inform DMC decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRes Involv Engagem
November 2024
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background: Within the contemporary policy turn towards co-production and co-research in Sweden, older people, practitioners and researchers alike have expressed uncertainty about how to undertake co-research. Moreover, scepticism persists about the merits and contributions of co-research and co-production to research and service development. In this paper, we aim to describe a co-research model developed with older care-experienced lay co-researchers and explore the utility of our model's outcomes to social care research and practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!