[Depth and integration of science modules in medical studies at recognized public and private faculties in Germany: A cross-sectional study].

Background: At the end of November 2020, four years after the adoption of the Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020, the Federal Ministry of Health presented the draft bill for the revision of the medical licensing regulations. This was adapted in August 2021 and stipulates, among other things, the completion of a mandatory scientific project up to the second stage of the medical examination, which is to be conducted within twelve weeks and based on the structured teaching of scientific skills using longitudinal courses. This study examines to what extent the mentioned aspects of the draft bill are already included in the current compulsory curricula in German medical study programs.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, we conducted a document analysis and an online survey of the student deaneries of state and private, state-recognized faculties of medicine in Germany. The objective was to assess the integration of curricular science projects and longitudinal science modules. The data was analyzed descriptively.

Results: In total, 40 (93%) of 43 faculties were included in the document analysis. 26 (60.5%) of 43 academic deans responded to the online questionnaire. Only twelve (30%) of the faculties offer a mandatory science project according to the document analysis and eight (30.8%) according to the evaluation of the online survey. In relative terms, a mandatory science project is already a curricular component in the majority of model and reform degree programs (document analysis: 83.3%, n=10 / N=12; questionnaire: 87.5%, n=7 / N=8). This contrasts with a significantly smaller number of regular degree programs that currently offer a science project as a mandatory component (document analysis: 16.7%, n=2 / N=12; questionnaire: 12.5%, n=1 / N=8). In the majority of the model and reform courses, a compulsory (longitudinal) science module has already been integrated into the curriculum (document analysis: 75%, n=12 / N=16; questionnaire: 55.5%, n=6 / N=11). This is only true for 25% (n=4 / N=12; document analysis) and 44.5% (n=5 / N=11; questionnaire) of the regular courses.

Discussion: The results of the surveys indicate that the regular study programs, in particular, need to be restructured in order to integrate the intended time frame of twelve weeks for an obligatory science project into the current curriculum. How this is to be achieved without reducing the existing study content seems to be still unclear. Regardless of the current draft bill, however, this step appears to be necessary in order to strengthen the acquisition of scientific competencies in medical studies and to adapt it to international medical education.

Conclusion: The majority of the current model and reformed medical study courses already fulfill the requirements of the draft bill for the new licensing regulations with regard to the curricular integration of an obligatory scientific project and longitudinal strand on scientific work, which offer hints on design possibilities for further faculties.