Importance: Obtaining follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (BSI) is standard practice, although its utility in patients with gram-negative bacterial BSI (GN-BSI) is unclear.
Objective: To examine whether obtaining FUBCs is associated with decreased mortality (key question [KQ] 1) and whether positive vs negative FUBCs are associated with increased mortality (KQ2).
Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and gray literature were searched from inception to March 11, 2022.
Study Selection: Two investigators used predefined eligibility criteria to independently screen titles, abstracts, and relevant full texts. Randomized clinical trials or observational studies that matched or statistically adjusted for differences in, at minimum, level of acute illness between patients in the intervention (eg, FUBCs obtained) and control (eg, FUBCs not obtained) groups were included in primary analyses. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded.
Data Extraction And Synthesis: Data abstraction and quality assessments were performed by one investigator and verified by a second investigator. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models. The study followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline.
Main Outcomes And Measures: Mortality before hospital discharge or up to 30 days from the index blood culture.
Results: From 3495 studies, 15 were included (all nonrandomized). In the 5 studies (n = 4378 patients) that met criteria for the KQ1 primary analysis, obtaining FUBCs was associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.71). For KQ2, 2 studies met criteria for the primary analysis (ie, matched or statistically adjusted for differences in patients with positive vs negative FUBCs), so an exploratory meta-analysis of all 9 studies that investigated KQ2 (n = 3243 patients) was performed. Positive FUBCs were associated with increased mortality relative to negative blood cultures (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.54-3.34). Limitations of the literature included a lack of randomized studies and few patient subgroup analyses.
Conclusions And Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, obtaining FUBCs in patients with GN-BSI was associated with decreased mortality. The benefit of FUBCs may stem from identification of patients with positive FUBCs, which was a poor prognostic marker.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500561 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32576 | DOI Listing |
JAC Antimicrob Resist
October 2024
University of Oklahoma Medical Center at OU Health, Department of Pharmacy, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Objectives: To evaluate the utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI) in ICU patients and identify risk factors for repeat positive cultures.
Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adults with Gram-negative BSI between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2020. Critically ill patients with one or more blood cultures positive for a Gram-negative organism were included.
Clin Microbiol Infect
July 2024
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Infectious Diseases, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Transpl Infect Dis
February 2024
Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Introduction: Gram-negative bacillary bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) is a frequent clinical challenge among immunocompromised hosts and is associated with a high mortality. The utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for GN-BSI in this population, particularly in the setting of neutropenia, is poorly defined.
Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study between the period of July 2018 and April 2022 to investigate the utility of FUBCs and delineate risk factors for positive cultures among neutropenic patients with monomicrobial GN-BSI.
Clin Microbiol Infect
September 2023
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy; Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy. Electronic address:
Background: The clinical usefulness of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs) represents a debated issue.
Objective: To assess the impact on the clinical outcome of FUBCs in patients with GN-BSI and to predict risk factors for persistent bacteraemia.
Data Sources: PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library Database were independently searched until 24 June, 2022.
Open Forum Infect Dis
December 2022
Department of Emergency and General Internal Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Background: Performing repeat blood cultures after an initial positive culture (ie, follow-up blood cultures [FUBCs]) in patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia is controversial. We aimed to comprehensively review the association of FUBCs with improvement in patient-relevant clinical outcomes in GNB bacteremia.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis to calculate summary effect estimates.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!