A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer in children with spina bifida using optical coherence tomography. | LitMetric

Purpose: Spina bifida (SB) is a congenital disorder caused by the incomplete fusion of the embryonic neural tube during spinal cord development. In this study, we used Spectral Domain Optic Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) for retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) analyses and compared the results of healthy children and SB patients in a similar age group.

Methods: Our study was planned prospectively and conducted between June 2017 and July 2019. One hundred eyes of 50 participants, consisting of 28 SB patients and 22 healthy children were included. In all cases, RNFL and GCC measurements were undertaken using SD-OCT. The circumpapillary RNFL analysis was conducted by examining the circular area of 3.45 mm in diameter around the centre of the optic disc. GCC parameters were determined with MM7 protocols by taking 15 vertical sections from a 7-mm macular square centred in the fovea.

Results: The mean GCC thickness of the participants was 91.120 ± 5.224 µm in the control group and 91.696 ± 7.410 µm in the SB group. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The mean RNFL thickness was 102.499 ± 11.250 µm in the control group and 99.549 ± 15.235 µm in the SB group. The mean RNFL thickness of the patients in the SB group was lower than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: In this study, the lack of a statistically significant difference in the RNFL and GCC values between the SB and control groups can be attributed to successful clinical management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103125DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control group
12
ganglion cell
8
cell complex
8
retinal nerve
8
spina bifida
8
coherence tomography
8
healthy children
8
rnfl gcc
8
group difference
8
rnfl thickness
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!