Rising partisan animosity is associated with a reduction in support for democracy and an increase in support for political violence. Here we provide a multi-level review of interventions designed to reduce partisan animosity, which we define as negative thoughts, feelings and behaviours towards a political outgroup. We introduce the TRI framework to capture three levels of intervention-thoughts (correcting misconceptions and highlighting commonalities), relationships (building dialogue skills and fostering positive contact) and institutions (changing public discourse and transforming political structures)-and connect these levels by highlighting the importance of motivation and mobilization. Our review encompasses both interventions conducted as part of academic research projects and real-world interventions led by practitioners in non-profit organizations. We also explore the challenges of durability and scalability, examine self-fulfilling polarization and interventions that backfire, and discuss future directions for reducing partisan animosity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01442-3 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Do people prefer to share political information that boosts their ingroup or derogates the outgroup?
J Exp Psychol Gen
January 2025
Department of Psychology, Cornell University.
Recent analyses of social media activity indicate that outgroup animosity drives user engagement more than ingroup favoritism, with content that derogates the outgroup tending to generate more viral responses online. However, it is unclear whether those findings are due to most people's underlying preferences or structural features of the social media landscape. To address this uncertainty, we conducted three experimental studies ( = 609) to examine how intended impact (ingroup favoritism/outgroup derogation) influences intentions to share both true and false news posts among U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSanctioning political speech on social media is driven by partisan norms and identity signaling.
PNAS Nexus
December 2024
Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, 133 S. 36th St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Social media is marked by online firestorms where people pile-on and shame those who say things perceived to be offensive, especially about politically relevant topics. What explains why individuals engage in this sort of sanctioning behavior? We show that two key factors help to explain this pattern. First, on these topics, both offensive speech and subsequent sanctioning are seen as informative about partisanship: people assume that those who say offensive things are out-partisans, and those who criticize them are co-partisans.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe July 2024 Trump assassination attempt was followed by lower in-group support for partisan violence and increased group unity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
December 2024
Department of Government, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.
The attempted assassination of Donald Trump led to widespread concern that the event would escalate political violence between U.S. partisans.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMegastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity.
Science
October 2024
Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Article Synopsis
- Scholars are concerned that deep partisan divides among the public pose a risk to American democracy.
- A large study with over 32,000 participants tested 25 different strategies aimed at decreasing partisan animosity and support for undemocratic practices.
- Results showed that highlighting relatable individuals with differing beliefs and emphasizing shared identities were effective at reducing animosity, while correcting misunderstandings about rival views helped lessen support for undemocratic actions.
Testing the social pressure hypothesis: Does in-party social pressure reduce out-party empathy?
PNAS Nexus
October 2024
Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Empathy is considered one of the most critical components for bridging political divides and reducing animosity between political groups. Yet, empathy between political opponents is rare. There is a growing concern that partisans do not empathize with out-partisans because they feel social pressure from fellow in-partisans not to do so.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!