AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study examines the prevalence, incidence, and persistence of psychotic experiences (PEs) in a large sample of adults in the Netherlands, revealing that 16.5% reported a PE in their lifetime and 30.1% had a PE at a three-year follow-up.
  • - Comparison between self-reported data and clinical interviews showed that self-reports indicated prevalence rates two to three times higher than validated assessments; however, the patterns of associated risk factors were consistent across both methods.
  • - The findings suggest that while self-reported data on PEs may be inflated, they can still serve as a cost-effective means for future studies, emphasizing the need for PEs to be assessed in general healthcare settings due to

Article Abstract

Background: Psychotic experiences (PEs) frequently occur and are associated with a range of negative health outcomes. Prospective studies on PEs are scarce, and to date no study investigated PE prevalence, incidence, persistence, their risk indicators, and psychiatric comorbidity, in one dataset. Furthermore, most studies are based on self-report, and it is unclear how this compares to clinical interviews.

Methods: Data are used from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a psychiatric cohort study among a representative sample of adults (baseline characteristics: = 6646; 49.6% female; 18-64 years). Results are presented for self-reported and clinically validated PEs. Associations are assessed for mental disorders, socio-demographic, vulnerability, physical health, and substance use factors.

Results: Based on self-report, at baseline 16.5% of respondents had at least one PE in their lifetime, of those, 30.1% also reported a PE at 3-year follow-up. 4.8% had a first PE at 3-year follow up. The 3-year prevalence of PE was associated with almost all studied risk indicators. Generally, the strongest associations were found for mental health disorders. Prevalence and incidence rates were two to three times higher in self-report than in clinical interview but results on associated factors were similar.

Conclusions: Validated prevalence and incidence estimates of PE are substantially lower than self-reported figures but results on associated factors were similar. Therefore, future studies on associations of PEs can rely on relatively inexpensive self-reports of PEs. The associations between PE and mental disorders underline the importance of assessment of PE in general practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722002690DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prevalence incidence
16
incidence persistence
8
psychotic experiences
8
risk indicators
8
based self-report
8
mental health
8
pes associations
8
mental disorders
8
associations mental
8
associated factors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!