Accuracy of digital auricular impression using intraoral scanner versus conventional impression technique for ear rehabilitation: A controlled clinical trial.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Prosthodontics department, Future University in Egypt, Fifth Settlement, End of 90 street, New Cairo, Cairo, Egypt. Electronic address:

Published: November 2022

Purpose: This research aims to compare the accuracy of different auricular impression techniques used to produce either a mirror image of the unaffected ear or a surgical stent and template for auricular rehabilitation. The research compares two digital ear impression techniques using an Intra-Oral digital Scanner (IOS) (with /without markers) versus a traditional technique using hydrocolloid impression materials.

Material And Methods: Eight participants were selected with intact right ears. Patients' right ears were digitally scanned with an IOS, once with resin markers and once without markers. A conventional auricular impression was taken for each participant, which was then scanned using a desktop scanner. The digital IOS technique with markers was set as a reference model. Total 3D deviations between the study groups were calculated using Geomagic control software (software for 3D coordinate measuring technology). An independent sample t-test was used to make comparisons between the two tested groups.

Results: The conventional impression and the intraoral scan without markers recorded a mean of 1.4057 ± 0.3581 and 0.7605±0.1469, respectively, of total 3D deviation from the intraoral scan with markers. There was a significant difference in auricular impression accuracy between conventional and intraoral scans without markers.

Conclusions: Using intraoral scanners facilitates impression acquisition and increases the accuracy compared to traditional hydrocolloid impression techniques, which may affect the shape of tissue due to its liability to be compressed by the impression material. Using markers allows for very precise data collection, reducing stitching complications that affect the accuracy of scans taken without markers.

Clinical Significance: The proposed technique for auricular digital impression using an intraoral scanner guarantees a fast technique with accurate results in acquiring anatomical data for the rehabilitation of ear defects. This research was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the following registration number: NCT04893902.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

auricular impression
16
impression
12
impression intraoral
12
impression techniques
12
intraoral scanner
8
conventional impression
8
hydrocolloid impression
8
intraoral scan
8
scan markers
8
markers
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!