A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effect of 3 % hydrogen peroxide irrigation on postoperative complications of rhinoplasty: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled Randomized Clinical Trial. | LitMetric

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of irrigation with 3% Hydrogen Peroxide solution on early complications of rhinoplasty. Volunteers who had physical status of ASA I were included in the study after informed written consent. This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Standard open rhinoplasty technique was performed for all patients. All patients underwent the same general anesthesia and post-operative analgesic protocol and the only difference between the two studied groups was the use of hydrogen peroxide for irrigation at the end of surgery. Finally, patients were examined for edema, inflammation, ecchymosis, and infections during 8 weeks after surgery. 50 volunteers (43 female and 7 male) with the mean age of 27.84 ± 7.64 were included in this study. Edema scores were constantly lower in the intervention group (p < 0.001), so was the median inflammation score (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in ecchymosis between the two groups (p > 0.05). No cases of post-operative infection were reported in any of the study groups. In conclusion, within the limitations of the study, it seems that irrigation with HO should be applied whenever appropriate, because of its potential positive effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2022.06.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hydrogen peroxide
12
peroxide irrigation
8
complications rhinoplasty
8
double-blinded placebo-controlled
8
clinical trial
8
included study
8
irrigation postoperative
4
postoperative complications
4
rhinoplasty double-blinded
4
placebo-controlled randomized
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!