Comparative outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation, the conventional method and navigation assistance in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A prospective comparative study with a two-year follow up.

Background: To compare and analyze the correction precision, clinical outcomes and complications among the three methods of performing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), including patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), conventional method and navigation assistance.

Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, we randomly assigned patients with knee osteoarthritis in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) with conventional method, navigation assistance or PSI. The primary outcome was the target/observed hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle difference at 1 month postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were changes in the postoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS) at 1 month and clinical outcomes including knee pain on a visual analogue scale (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe pain), Lysholm and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (ranging from 0 to 240) scores at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.

Results: From 2017 through 2019, a total of 608 patients were screened; of those patients, 144 were enrolled, with 48 in each group. The primary outcome of the HKA difference was 2.6 ± 2.0° in the conventional group, 2.3 ± 1.5° in the navigation group and 0.6 ± 1.0° in the PSI group (P < 0.001). Secondary outcomes including changes in the postoperative PTS and clinical outcomes at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months were in the same direction as the primary outcome. There were no significant differences in the complications among the three groups.

Conclusions: In the present study, none of the three methods showed superiority in objective correction precision and clinical outcomes at 2 years.