Market survey of disposable e-cigarette nicotine content and e-liquid volume.

BMC Public Health

McKinney Regulatory Science Advisors LLC, Richmond, VA, 23231, USA.

Published: September 2022

Inaccurate labels on some e-cigarette products have prompted calls for routine testing to monitor product label integrity. The objective of this study was to compare label statements of commercial disposable/non-chargeable e-cigarette products for nicotine concentration and e-liquid volume with analytically verified levels. Commercial e-cigarette samples were analyzed for nicotine concentration (N = 51), e-liquid volume and total nicotine content (N = 39). Twenty-three of the 51 samples analyzed for nicotine deviated from their label statements by more than ± 10%. Deviations ranged from -50.1% to + 13.9%. Thirty of the 39 samples analyzed for e-liquid volume deviated from their label statements by more than ± 10%. Deviations ranged from -62.1% to + 13.3%. Only one brand listed total nicotine on the label. In thirty-one of the 39 samples, calculated total nicotine amount in e-liquid deviated from the amounts calculated from the label metrics by more than ± 10%. Deviations ranged from -66.8% to -1.43%. These findings underscore the need for regulatory enforcement of manufacturing quality control and product labeling practices to optimize the harm reduction potential and consumer experience associated with the use of e-cigarette products.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482302PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14152-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

e-liquid volume
16
e-cigarette products
12
label statements
12
samples analyzed
12
total nicotine
12
than ± 10% deviations
12
deviations ranged
12
nicotine content
8
nicotine concentration
8
analyzed nicotine
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!