Objective: Continuing medical education (CME) programs are planned to provide medical professionals with the opportunity to stay abreast of new developments in their field. After each program, CME attendees are given the chance to evaluate the success of the activity in meeting its defined learning objectives. Over one-third of intent-to-change statements from CME evaluations do not match the stated learning objectives. We examined unmatched objectives and intent-to-change statements to determine their usefulness for future meeting planning.
Methods: This retrospective mixed-method content analysis used quantitative, deductive content analysis to compare intent-to-change statements and learning objectives from American Association of Neurological Surgeons-sponsored CME activities to explore unintended learning themes.
Results: We examined 85 CME activities with 424 meeting objectives and 1950 intent-to-change statements. Approximately 37% of intent-to-change statements were unrelated to any meeting objective, and 15% of learning objectives had no associated intent-to-change statements. Among unmatched objectives, those regarding more general subject matter often failed to be met with intent-to-change statements for multiple years, whereas those related to clinical practice were more likely to be unmatched for only 1 year. Some CME learning objectives are repeated for the same meeting for multiple years without change, although 22.6% of unmatched intent-to-change statements led to new learning objectives in subsequent years.
Conclusions: An analysis of intent-to-change statements that are unmatched to meeting learning objectives is a potential avenue for understanding outcomes of CME activities. Our observations about general versus specific learning objective language may prove useful for CME planners' future educational event formulation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.029 | DOI Listing |
World Neurosurg
November 2022
Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Objective: Continuing medical education (CME) programs are planned to provide medical professionals with the opportunity to stay abreast of new developments in their field. After each program, CME attendees are given the chance to evaluate the success of the activity in meeting its defined learning objectives. Over one-third of intent-to-change statements from CME evaluations do not match the stated learning objectives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Contin Educ Health Prof
October 2022
Mr. Dunson: Medical Student, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Dr. Park: Associate Professor and Associate Head of Medical Education, Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL. Dr. Park's current affiliation is Massachusetts General Hospital, Havard Medical School, Boston, MA. Dr. Richards: Professor of Pediatrics on the Lecturer Track,School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Dr. Hirshfield: Associate Professor, Co-director of the PhD program in Curriculum Studies/HPE and the Associate Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL. Dr. Jensen: Professor of Neurosurgery, Radiation Oncology, and Oncological Sciences; Neurosurgery Vice Chair of Education and Residency Program Director, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Introduction: Successful completion of continuing medical education (CME) activities is often required for ongoing physician board certification, licensure, and hospital privileges. CME activities are designed to address professional knowledge or practice gaps. The authors examined participants' "intent to change" after CME activities to evaluate whether CME activity content was suitably linked with the stated learning objectives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open Qual
June 2020
Director, Partnering with Consumers, Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Background: With over half of expected deaths occurring in acute hospitals, and a workforce not trained to care for them, good quality end-of-life care in these settings is hard to achieve. The has been translated into e-learning modules by the End of Life Essentials project, and this study aims to demonstrate how clinicians interpret the Consensus Statement in their day-to-day practice by answering the question at the end of each module: 'Tomorrow, the one thing I can change to more appropriately provide end-of-life care is…'.
Methods: The modules were developed by a palliative care educator with the support of a peer review group and were piloted with 35 health professionals.
Am J Manag Care
December 2009
Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Research, 10065 E Harvard Ave, Ste 300, Denver, CO 80231, USA.
Objective: To report outcomes of a pilot online curriculum educating clinicians about off-label prescribing, finding unbiased sources of pharmaceutical information, and responding to patient inquiries about direct-to-consumer advertised medications.
Study Design: Case study.
Methods: We developed 3 case-oriented Internet modules to educate healthcare professionals about off-label prescribing, accessing and appraising unbiased drug information, and talking with patients about direct-to-consumer advertising.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!