AI Article Synopsis

  • Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs) help oncologists choose targeted therapies based on next-generation sequencing for advanced cancer, but there's limited evidence on how effective they are.
  • A phase II clinical trial involving 93 patients showed that those receiving MTB-recommended therapies had a significant chance of improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to their previous treatments.
  • The study found that the majority of patients experienced better PFS with MTB-directed therapy, suggesting it could be a beneficial approach for treating advanced cancer.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs) interpret next-generation sequencing reports and help oncologists determine best therapeutic options; however, there is a paucity of data regarding their clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to determine if MTB-directed therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) over immediately prior therapy in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: This single-arm, prospective phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced cancer with an actionable mutation who received MTB-recommended targeted therapy between January 1, 2017, and October 31, 2020. MTB-recommended both on-label (level 1 evidence) and off-label (evidence levels 2 and 3) therapies. Of the 93 enrolled patients, 43 were treated frontline and 50 received second-line or greater-line therapy. The primary outcome was the probability of patients treated with second-line or greater-line MTB-directed therapy who achieved a PFS ratio ≥ 1.3 (PFS on MTB-directed therapy divided by PFS on the patient's immediately prior therapy). Secondary outcomes included PFS for patients treated frontline and overall survival and adverse effects for the entire study population.

Results: The most common disease sites were lung (35 of 93, 38%), gynecologic (17 of 93, 18%), GI (16 of 93, 17%), and head and neck (7 of 93, 8%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of PFS ratio ≥ 1.3 was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.75) for patients treated with second-line or greater-line MTB-directed therapy. The median PFS was 449 (range 42-1,125) days for patients treated frontline. The median overall survival was 768 (range 22-1,240) days. There were four nontreatment-related deaths.

Conclusion: When treated with MTB-directed therapy, most patients experienced improved PFS compared with immediately prior treatment. MTB-directed targeted therapy may be a strategy to improve outcomes for patients with advanced cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489195PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.21.00524DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mtb-directed therapy
20
patients treated
20
advanced cancer
12
patients advanced
12
treated frontline
12
second-line greater-line
12
therapy
10
patients
9
molecular tumor
8
phase clinical
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs) help oncologists choose targeted therapies based on next-generation sequencing for advanced cancer, but there's limited evidence on how effective they are.
  • A phase II clinical trial involving 93 patients showed that those receiving MTB-recommended therapies had a significant chance of improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to their previous treatments.
  • The study found that the majority of patients experienced better PFS with MTB-directed therapy, suggesting it could be a beneficial approach for treating advanced cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!