AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzes the costs associated with different breast cancer treatment options over two years for Finnish patients, highlighting variations in expenses tied to surgical methods.
  • The research involved measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for 1,065 patients using specialized questionnaires and comparing costs across different treatment groups.
  • Findings indicate that while immediate and delayed reconstruction had high costs, they also provided good HRQoL, whereas mastectomy resulted in lower HRQoL and higher costs, suggesting potential benefits in identifying candidates for immediate reconstruction earlier to lower overall treatment expenses.

Article Abstract

Background/aim: Different treatment options of breast cancer (BC) are dependent on certain cancer- and patient-related features. The cost of treatment varies among patients. This study describes the cost distribution in the treatment of Finnish patients with BC for two years and relates the costs to important outcomes of modern BC treatment.

Patients And Methods: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of 1,065 patients was measured prospectively at baseline, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months thereafter with a generic (15D) and a disease-specific (EORTC QLQ C-30 BR23) HRQoL-instrument. Clinical data and costs of care were collected from hospital records. Patients were divided into four groups according to the surgical approach: breast-conserving surgery (BCS n=661), mastectomy (n=319), immediate reconstruction (IBR n=51), and delayed reconstruction (DR n=34), and the costs according to the clinic responsible for treatment: oncological-, breast surgery-, and plastic surgery unit. Total costs of care during follow-up are presented groupwise alongside HRQoL results.

Results: The mean total cost for BC surgery was 6,015 Euros for BCS, 8,114 euros for mastectomy, 18,217 Euros for IBR, and 19,041 Euros for DR. BCS, IBR, and DR produced good HRQoL. Mastectomy patients had the lowest overall HRQoL and highest cost accumulation at the oncology unit. HRQoL of IBR and DR patients was similar.

Conclusion: DR produces good HRQoL but generates the highest costs of care. If patients that require reconstruction could be identified earlier and offered IBR instead of mastectomy followed by later DR, the costs of care might be reduced.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463886PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12957DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

costs care
16
breast cancer
8
health-related quality
8
euros bcs
8
good hrqol
8
patients
7
costs
6
hrqol
6
cost
5
ibr
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!