A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of 3D-Printed Swabs for Sampling in SARS-CoV-2 Detection: A Pilot Study. | LitMetric

In this pilot study, we characterize and evaluate 3D-printed swabs for the collection of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal secretion samples for the SARS-CoV-2 detection. Swabs are made with the fused deposition modeling technique using the biopolymer polylactic acid (PLA) which is a medical-grade, biodegradable and low-cost material. We evaluated six swabs with mechanical tests in a laboratory and in an Adult Human Simulator performed by healthcare professionals. We proved the adequacy of the PLA swab to be used in the gold standard reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for viral RNA detection. Then, we did in vitro validation for cell collection using the 3D-printed swabs and RNA extraction for samples from 10 healthy volunteers. The 3D-printed swabs showed good flexibility and maneuverability for sampling and at the same time robustness to pass into the posterior nasopharynx. The PLA did not interfere with the RNA extraction process and qRT-PCR test. When we evaluated the expression of the reference gene (RNase P) used in the SARS-CoV-2 detection, the 3D-printed swabs showed good reproducibility in the threshold cycle values (Ct = 23.5, range 19-26) that is comparable to control swabs (Ct = 24.7, range 20.8-32.6) with p value = 0.47. The 3D-printed swabs demonstrated to be a reliable, and an economical alternative for mass use in the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9466338PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03057-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

3d-printed swabs
24
sars-cov-2 detection
12
swabs
9
pilot study
8
rna extraction
8
swabs good
8
detection
5
3d-printed
5
validation 3d-printed
4
swabs sampling
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!