A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Frequency of working at home, body mass index, and productivity in Japanese office workers: A cohort study. | LitMetric

Background: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of people working at home has grown significantly.

Objective: This cohort study aimed to investigate whether the frequency of working at home was associated with changes in body mass index (BMI) and productivity from 2018 to 2020.

Method: Frequency of working at home was self-reported. Participants were classified into three groups based on mean frequency of working at home per week (no working at home: ≦ 0.5 days, low frequency: 0.5 to 2.5 days, and high frequency: >2.5 days). Productivity was measured using a numerical rating scale, and BMI was calculated using height and weight. Changes in BMI and productivity were calculated by subtracting 2018 data from 2020 data. Linear regression analysis was performed by considering BMI and productivity change as outcomes and frequency of working at home as explanatory variable.

Results: BMI change in the high frequency group was significantly smaller than in the group that did not work at home (crude; coefficient: -0.27; 95% CI: -0.55--0.01, adjusted; coefficient: -0.30; 95% CI: -0.60--0.01). Frequency of working at home was not associated with productivity change.

Conclusion: Working at home may be a solution for preventing BMI from increasing significantly.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210249DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

frequency working
24
bmi productivity
12
frequency
9
body mass
8
cohort study
8
working
8
working associated
8
high frequency
8
productivity
6
bmi
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!