Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Gunshot residue (GSR) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analyses are used in the reconstruction of shooting incidents involving firearms. In both fields, adhesive tapes are commonly applied to recover traces. Using a simultaneous sampling approach for retrieving both types of traces from objects related to a shooting can be powerful. We present the results for DNA testing and GSR analysis using "DNA stubs" to recover both types of traces in one sampling. The analyses are successive: stubs are first examined with scanning electron microscopy for the presence of GSR and next subjected to DNA extraction and short tandem repeat (STR) typing. The results show no negative effect on the DNA and GSR results. The risk of DNA contamination during GSR analysis is addressed, showing that it is negligible. Our experiences in casework show that the approach can be successfully implemented.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15121 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!