Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In naturalistic auditory scenes, relevant information is rarely concentrated at a single location, but rather unpredictably scattered in- and out-field-of-view (in-/out-FOV). Although the parsing of a complex auditory scene is a fairly simple job for a healthy human auditory system, the uncertainty represents a major issue in the development of effective hearing aid (HA) processing strategies. Whereas traditional omnidirectional microphones (OM) amplify the complete auditory scene without enhancing signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) between in- and out-FOV streams, directional microphones (DM) may greatly increase SNR at the cost of preventing HA users to perceive out-FOV information. The present study compares the conventional OM and DM HA settings to a split processing (SP) scheme differentiating between in- and out-FOV processing. We recorded electroencephalographic data of ten young, normal-hearing listeners who solved a cocktail-party-scenario-paradigm with continuous auditory streams and analyzed neural tracking of speech with a stimulus reconstruction (SR) approach. While results for all settings exhibited significantly higher SR accuracies for attended in-FOV than unattended out-FOV streams, there were distinct differences between settings. In-FOV SR performance was dominated by DM and SP and out-FOV SR accuracies were significantly higher for SP compared to OM and DM. Our results demonstrate the potential of a SP approach to combine the advantages of traditional OM and DM settings without introduction of significant compromises.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9870826 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!