AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated COVID-19 vaccination coverage and vaccine hesitancy among adults and healthcare workers in the Gaza Strip in October 2021, highlighting significant challenges due to the ongoing humanitarian crisis.
  • A total of 1,075 individuals were surveyed, revealing a 49% vaccination rate among the general population and a much higher rate of 89% among healthcare workers, with 34% of the overall population expressing vaccine hesitancy.
  • The analysis showed that factors such as being male, older age, higher education, and confidence in vaccine safety were positively associated with vaccination status, while similar factors contributed to vaccine hesitancy.

Article Abstract

Background: The Gaza Strip, like other settings of complex humanitarian emergencies, faces immense challenges in vaccinating its population against COVID-19. This study was conducted in October 2021 among Gaza's adult population and healthcare workers (HCWs). The primary aim was to estimate two indicators, coverage of COVID-19 vaccination and the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy. The secondary aim was to evaluate the two indicators' associations with globally identified risk factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a population-based survey of adults and a purposive survey of HCWs in Gaza. A multi-stage sampling design was used for the population survey component. For the HCW component, five health facilities were purposively selected as entry points; HCWs in the facilities holding clinical or other specialized positions were approached to participate in the survey. Data were summarized as univariable descriptive statistics with unweighted and weighted point estimates. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations of risk factors with vaccination status and vaccine hesitancy.

Results: A total of 1075 individuals were surveyed, of whom 906 were community members and 169 were HCWs. Population-weighted vaccine coverage was estimated to be 49.08% (95% CI 43.10-55.08). 89.35% of HCWs were vaccinated. Population-weighted vaccine hesitancy was estimated to be 34.08% (95% CI 28.14-40.56) in the overall population and 67.24% (95% CI 49.04-81.41) among the unvaccinated sub-group. In logistic regression vaccination was independently associated with male sex (aOR 1.88, p = 0.006, 95% CI 1.20-2.95), older age (40+ vs. 18-39 age group) (aOR 1.92, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.73-2.13), higher education (aOR 2.19, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.51-3.17), and confidence in the safety of the vaccine (aOR 13.8, p < 0.001, 95% CI 10.1-18.8). Risk factors for hesitancy were similar to those identified for vaccination status, however hesitant individuals were somewhat more likely to obtain vaccine information from family members (aOR 1.29, p = 0.051, 95% CI 1.00-1.67) and less likely to trust healthcare providers (aOR 0.58, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.49-0.68).

Conclusions: The continued emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants reinforces the importance of achieving high levels of vaccination coverage globally-a difficult undertaking in Gaza. This study estimated half of Gaza's adult population received at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine by October 2021, and the majority of unvaccinated individuals were hesitant. Disparities in vaccination across the territory's demographic groups underscore the need for targeted outreach to these populations and messaging through community-based channels to permeate social networks of the unvaccinated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9461392PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00477-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

covid-19 vaccination
8
gaza strip
8
cross-sectional study
8
vaccine coverage
8
risk factors
8
community members
8
healthcare workers
8
study conducted
8
vaccine hesitancy
8
logistic regression
8

Similar Publications

This study introduces a five-compartment model to account for the impacts of vaccination-induced recovery and nonlinear treatment rates in settings with limited hospital capacity. To reflect real-world scenarios, the model incorporates multiple reinfections in both vaccinated and recovered groups. It reveals a range of dynamics, including a disease-free equilibrium and up to six endemic equilibria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Households are a significant source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, even during periods of low community-level spread. Comparing household transmission rates by SARS-CoV-2 variant may provide relevant information about current risks and prevention strategies. This investigation aimed to estimate differences in household transmission risk comparing the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants using data from contact tracing and interviews conducted from November 2021 through February 2022 in five U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aims to analyze the diagnostic readiness to Covid-19 and the genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Brasília, the capital of Brazil. This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study, with data from: cases/deaths-Ministry of Health; RT-PCR analyses Brasília Central Public Health Laboratory (LACEN); genomics-Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID). It was found that in March 2021, with the Gamma variant was predominant, RT-PCR diagnostic tests administered by LACEN reached their peak, followed by a reduction, possibly due to the start of vaccination.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Randomised trial of same vs opposite arm co-administration of inactivated influenza and SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.

JCI Insight

January 2025

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Background: The immunogenicity of current influenza vaccines need improvement. Inactivated influenza and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can be co-administered but randomized controlled trial data is lacking on whether the two vaccines are more immunogenic if given in the same or opposite arms. Murine studies suggest mRNA vaccines can adjuvant influenza vaccines when co-formulated and delivered together.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unraveling the Use of Disinformation Hashtags by Social Bots During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Social Networks Analysis.

JMIR Infodemiology

January 2025

Computational Social Science DataLab, University Institute of Research for Sustainable Social Development (INDESS), University of Cadiz, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media platforms have been a venue for the exchange of messages, including those related to fake news. There are also accounts programmed to disseminate and amplify specific messages, which can affect individual decision-making and present new challenges for public health.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze how social bots use hashtags compared to human users on topics related to misinformation during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!