Objective: To compare opioid use and pain scores in women who had scheduled cesarean birth before and after implementing a scheduled nonopioid analgesia practice guideline.

Design: Quality improvement project with a comparison of pre-/postintervention.

Setting/local Problem: A 170-bed community hospital where the administration of postcesarean pain medications was unstandardized.

Participants: Convenience sample of 175 individuals who were scheduled for cesarean birth (106 in preintervention group and 69 in postimplementation group).

Intervention/measurements: All participants had received a dose of 150 mcg of intrathecal morphine intraoperatively. Care of participants in the postimplementation group included a new practice guideline using preoperative oral acetaminophen 1 g and postoperative intravenous ketorolac 30 mg that transitioned to ibuprofen 600 mg orally every 6 hours until discharge. Acetaminophen 1 g every 6 hours also continued until discharge. For breakthrough pain, oxycodone 5 mg to 10 mg was available.

Results: Results were analyzed using the chi-square and t test. There was a statistical difference in the mean milligram morphine equivalent consumed after scheduled cesarean birth (preintervention = 21.15 vs. postintervention = 3.91, p < .001). Postimplementation, 84.1% of participants did not consume any opioids beyond the intrathecal dose compared to 47.2% of participants preintervention. Mean pain scores decreased from 2.49 to 1.62 (p < .001), and there was an observed decrease of the highest reported pain score from 5.39 to 4.03 (p < .001).

Conclusion: The results of this project support the current literature indicating that the administration of a scheduled nonopioid multimodal analgesia regimen to individuals with scheduled cesarean birth is an effective postoperative pain management strategy. This approach to managing surgical birth pain can decrease subjective reports of pain and overall opioid consumption during the hospital stay.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2022.07.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scheduled cesarean
20
cesarean birth
20
scheduled nonopioid
12
scheduled
8
nonopioid analgesia
8
opioid consumption
8
pain
8
pain scores
8
individuals scheduled
8
acetaminophen 1 g
8

Similar Publications

Background: Disparities in labor epidural analgesia (LEA) management could reduce maternal satisfaction and increase risk. We compared times from the first administration of breakthrough pain medication (top-up) to LEA replacement to evaluate disparities across race.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study (01-01-2018 to 12-31-2022), all patients with LEA and maternal race/ethnicity of non-Hispanic White or Black were eligible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Giant omphalocele poses a conflict between eviscerated content and abdominal capacity, with associated risks such as compartment syndrome or cardiovascular compromise.

Clinical Case: We present the case of a prenatally diagnosed hepato-omphalocele, without associated abnormalities. At week 37, botulinum toxin was injected in the right hemiabdomen under fetal and maternal sedation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Post-cesarean delivery (CD) acute pain may progress to chronic pain, which may impair maternal bonding and child development. In 2013, we compared the efficacy of versus on-demand oral analgesia for post-caesarean pain in a randomized-controlled-trial. The fixed-time-interval group had received scheduled paracetamol, tramadol, and diclofenac regardless of pain level, and the on-demand group received medication as needed, with oxycodone reserved for unrelieved pain in both groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Women's Experience of the Consent Process to Planned Caesarean Section and Its Surgical Risk: A Qualitative Study.

BJOG

December 2024

Department of Women's Cancer, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, Medical School Building, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.

Objective: To explore how women appreciated the risks discussed within the consent process for planned caesarean section (CS).

Design: Exploratory qualitative interview study.

Setting: NHS Teaching Hospital in Central London.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!