AI Article Synopsis

  • Protein hydrolysates (PHs) are plant biostimulants made from amino acids and peptides derived from protein sources, but their effects on cut flowers are not well-studied.
  • In research involving two chrysanthemum cultivars, plant-derived PHs significantly increased fresh plant biomass and improved overall plant health compared to controls, while the animal-derived PH had less positive effects.
  • Notably, certain PH treatments affected nutrient concentration in leaves and flowers, influenced flower stem longevity, and the ability of flowers to retain water during vase life was linked to nutrient transport issues rather than salt buildup.

Article Abstract

Protein hydrolysates (PHs) are a prominent category of plant biostimulants, mainly constituted of amino acids, oligopeptides and polypeptides, obtained by partial hydrolysis of animal or plant protein sources. Despite scientific evidence supporting the biostimulant action of PHs on vegetables, the morphological, physiological, and shelf-life performances underlying the PH action on cut flowers are still poorly explored. Accordingly, the aim of this research is to assess the effects of three commercial biostimulants, one animal PH (PH A, Hicure) and two plant PHs (PH V1, Trainer and PH V2, Vegamin©), on two chrysanthemum () cultivars (Pinacolada and Radost). In both cultivars, only the plant-derived PH (V1 and V2) treatments recorded significantly higher fresh plant biomass than the control (on average +18%, in both cultivars). The foliar application of the vegetal-derived PHs but not the animal one, particularly in Pinacolada, improved the status of plants, stimulating stem elongation and the apical flower diameter. In Pinacolada, applications with PH V1 resulted in a significant increase in nitrate and P concentration in leaves and Ca content in flowers compared with the control (+43%, +27%, and +28% for nitrate, P, and Ca, respectively). In Radost, PH A and PH V2 applications caused a significant reduction in nitrate concentration in both leaves and flowers compared with the control. One week after harvest, in both cultivars, PH A applications caused flower stems to wilt faster than the control. In contrast, plants treated with PH V1 revealed significantly slower flower stem senescence compared to the control. Flower wilting during vase life was correlated to a decrease in the K-to-Na ratio in flowers due to an inability to transport K to the flowers from the leaves rather than an increase in Na in the flowers themselves.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460061PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11172321DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

compared control
12
protein hydrolysates
8
nitrate concentration
8
concentration leaves
8
flowers compared
8
applications caused
8
flowers
6
control
5
animal
4
hydrolysates animal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!