AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare two methods for reconstructing post-extraction bone defects: using a non-resorbable d-PTFE membrane left exposed versus guided bone regeneration (GBR) performed later, over a period of four weeks and two months, respectively.
  • Conducted as a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Italy with 18 enrolled patients, the study found no instances of implant failure or complications, and all patients reported satisfaction with their implants.
  • While histological analyses showed well-mineralized bone in both groups, the regenerated bone appeared more mature in the GBR group, though overall there were no significant differences in tissue volume between the two methods.

Article Abstract

: The aim of the present study was to investigate quantitative histological examination of bone reconstructed with non-resorbable high-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (d-PTFE), left intentionally exposed in post extraction sockets grafted with anorganic bone material, and removed after four weeks, versus extraction and guided bone regeneration (GBR), performed two months later. : This study was designed as a multicenter randomized controlled trial of parallel-group design. Patients were selected and consecutively treated in three centers in Italy. Patients randomly received intentionally exposed non-resorbable d-PTFE membrane (group A), or guided bone regeneration (group B), to treat post-extractive alveolar bone defects with implant-supported restorations. Outcomes were: the implant failure, any mechanical and biological complications, patient satisfaction, and qualitative and histomorphometric evaluation of the collected bone samples. : Eighteen patients were consecutively enrolled in the trial. Of these, six out of 18 patients were male. All the included patients were treated according to the allocated interventions, and no drop out occurred. No implant failure and no complications were experienced, and all the patients were fully satisfied with the function and aesthetic of their implant-supported restoration, without difference between groups. Morphological analysis revealed no sign of tissue reaction, such as fibrosis or necrosis. Regenerated bone was well mineralized in both groups, but it seemed more mature in group B than in group A. Three samples showed a minimal number of lymphocytes. Several blood vessels of small size occupied the medullary spaces, where the tissue resulted in more maturity, indicating the activity of the tissue in progress. The histomorphometric evaluation showed no statistically significant differences in the tissue volume fractions between the two groups of patients. : With the limitation of the present study, buccal plate reconstruction with an intentionally exposed non-resorbable membrane is an effective and easy procedure for regenerating a resorbed buccal bone plate, reducing the need for guided bone regeneration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9457509PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15175838DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intentionally exposed
16
guided bone
16
bone regeneration
16
exposed non-resorbable
12
bone
11
non-resorbable d-ptfe
8
d-ptfe membrane
8
post-extractive alveolar
8
alveolar bone
8
bone defects
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!