Background: The impact on cost relative to clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients who undergo robotic-assisted lobectomy is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to compare cost and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 574 patients who underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy for primary lung carcinoma from May 1, 2017 to June 1, 2021. The ERAS protocol was implemented on October 17, 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity scores was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcomes of the study were mean direct and indirect hospital costs, complication rates, and hospital length of stay.

Results: Three hundred fifteen patients underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy before implementation of the ERAS protocol, and 259 patients were enrolled on the protocol. A significantly higher percentage of patients were discharged home in less than 3 days after the ERAS protocol implementation (24.5% vs 9.8%, P = .001). There were significant decreases in the inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted mean direct hospital costs (P < .001) and mean indirect costs (P = .018) for the total hospital stay after ERAS protocol implementation. The mean initial discharge opioid medication dose (morphine equivalent dose) was significantly lower (P < .001) after the ERAS protocol.

Conclusions: Increased early discharge and decreased hospital costs were observed for robotic-assisted lobectomy after implementation of an ERAS protocol. There was also an observed significant decrease in the discharge opioid medication doses prescribed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.08.039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

robotic-assisted lobectomy
24
eras protocol
20
lobectomy implementation
12
implementation eras
12
hospital costs
12
outcomes robotic-assisted
8
enhanced recovery
8
recovery surgery
8
eras
8
patients underwent
8

Similar Publications

Background: The real-world safety of robotic resections after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy remains poorly defined in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Due to reported increased operative challenges after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, we aim to describe our early institutional experience and outcomes after robotic resection in this clinical context.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent a robotic lobectomy, comparing patients from June 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023, who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy consistent with the Checkmate-816 protocol and a control group with upfront resection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in robotic lobectomy have been associated with decreased length of stay (LOS). We evaluated differences in patient characteristics and achievements of ERAS benchmarks by discharge groups at a tertiary referral center.

Materials And Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained ERAS database of patients undergoing robotic lobectomy for pulmonary malignancy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The introduction of targeted treatments and immunotherapy in lung cancer has transformed patient care by offering "precision medicine" focused on the characteristics of the disease. The same concept has emerged in lung cancer surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Systematic Review of Sublobar Resection for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

December 2024

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center. Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address:

Sublobar resection offers a parenchymal-sparing surgical alternative to lobectomy and includes wedge resection and segmentectomy. Sublobar resection has been historically utilized in high-risk patients with compromised lung function; however, the technique is becoming more prevalent for normal-risk patients with peripheral lung tumors < 2 cm. In this article, we summarize the technique of sublobar resection, the importance of surgical margins and lymph node sampling, patient selection, perioperative complications, outcomes, and the impact of sublobar resection on the quality of life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Uniportal Robotic Lobectomy and Lymphadenectomy for Invasive Lung Cancer: A Novel Approach and Perioperative Outcomes.

Thorac Cancer

November 2024

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Background: Multiport robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (mRATS) has been comprehensively evaluated for its clinical efficacy in numerous studies. Nevertheless, the safety and feasibility of uniportal robotic lobectomy and lymphadenectomy require further validation.

Methods: The clinical data of 34 consecutive patients with lung cancer who underwent improved uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uRATS) at our hospital between November 2023 and June 2024 were reviewed retrospectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!