A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prognostic impact of Breslow thickness in acral melanoma: A retrospective analysis. | LitMetric

Prognostic impact of Breslow thickness in acral melanoma: A retrospective analysis.

J Am Acad Dermatol

Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Published: December 2022

Background: Evidence for the prognostic importance of tumor thickness in acral melanoma (AM) patients is limited.

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the prognostic impact of Breslow thickness in AM.

Methods: This multicenter study enrolled patients diagnosed with localized AM between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2017. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in different tumor thickness strata (T1-T4: ≤1, >1-2, >2-4, >4 mm, respectively) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons were performed by the log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression.

Results: A total of 853 patients with clinical N0 (cN0) AM were included in the analysis. The median follow-up time was 60.1 months. The median MSS in patients with T1-T4 disease was not reached, 111.0, 92.8, and 67.1 months, respectively. MSS differed significantly among cN0 patients with T1-T3 AM (log-rank P = .004, .012, <0.001 for T1 vs T2, T2 vs T3, and T1 vs T3, respectively); however, there was no significant difference between T3 and T4 AM (hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.62-1.09). Six-subgroup analyses confirmed that survival outcomes were similar between different subgroups with tumor thickness >2 mm.

Limitations: The limitations were retrospective design and some missing variables.

Conclusions: There was no association between tumor thickness and survival in AM patients with a Breslow thickness >2 mm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2022.08.052DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breslow thickness
12
tumor thickness
12
prognostic impact
8
impact breslow
8
thickness acral
8
acral melanoma
8
thickness
6
patients
6
melanoma retrospective
4
retrospective analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!