Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Performing analog computations with metastructures is an emerging wave-based paradigm for solving mathematical problems. For such devices, one major challenge is their reconfigurability, especially without the need for a priori mathematical computations or computationally-intensive optimization. Their equation-solving capabilities are applied only to matrices with special spectral (eigenvalue) distribution. Here we report the theory and design of wave-based metastructures using tunable elements capable of solving integral/differential equations in a fully-reconfigurable fashion. We consider two architectures: the Miller architecture, which requires the singular-value decomposition, and an alternative intuitive direct-complex-matrix (DCM) architecture introduced here, which does not require a priori mathematical decomposition. As examples, we demonstrate, using system-level simulation tools, the solutions of integral and differential equations. We then expand the matrix inverting capabilities of both architectures toward evaluating the generalized Moore-Penrose matrix inversion. Therefore, we provide evidence that metadevices can implement generalized matrix inversions and act as the basis for the gradient descent method for solutions to a wide variety of problems. Finally, a general upper bound of the solution convergence time reveals the rich potential that such metadevices can offer for stationary iterative schemes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452564 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00950-1 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!