Background: Despite the demonstrated efficacy and safety of biosimilar filgrastim-aafi (Nivestim™), few studies have compared its use in real-life clinical practice to the originator filgrastim (Neupogen™).

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of filgrastim and filgrastim-aafi for the primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy induced-febrile neutropenia in the real-life setting.

Patients And Methods: A retrospective cohort study included all adult cancer patients at the King Hussein Cancer Centre requiring primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia between 2014 and 2016. Two cohorts were selected: patients who received filgrastim and those who received filgrastim-aafi. The primary endpoint was the incidence of febrile neutropenia; the secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), hospital admissions due to febrile neutropenia, and the mean length of hospitalization. Chi-squared tests were performed to evaluate differences between groups. Logistic regression was conducted to adjust for confounding factors.

Results: A total of 268 patients were identified, with 88 in the filgrastim cohort and 180 in the filgrastim-aafi cohort; 64%were females. The mean age was 47 (±15) years. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 21.6% in the filgrastim cohort and 15% in the filgrastim-aafi cohort (P = 0.179). No statistically significant differences were detected in the incidence of hospital admission (P = 0.551) or ADRs (P = 0.623) between the two cohorts. Upon adjusting for the confounding factors, results remained statistically insignificant.

Conclusion: Filgrastim and filgrastim-aafi had comparable effectiveness and safety as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. More extensive prospective studies with additional insight on the cost implications are required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712837PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-022-00312-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

febrile neutropenia
20
primary prophylaxis
16
effectiveness safety
12
prophylaxis chemotherapy-induced
12
safety filgrastim
8
filgrastim-aafi nivestim™
8
chemotherapy-induced febrile
8
cohort study
8
filgrastim filgrastim-aafi
8
filgrastim-aafi primary
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To analyze the usefulness of mean mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) level to stratify risk in emergency department patients with solid tumors attended for febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy. To compare risk prediction with MR-proADM to that of conventional biomarkers and scores on the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score.

Methods: Prospective observational cohort study enrolling patients with solid tumors who developed febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Febrile neutropenia in the emergency department: Hospitalize or discharge?

Emergencias

December 2024

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla La Mancha (IDISCAM), Toledo, España. GT-LATINFURG: Grupo de Trabajo Latinoamericano para la mejora de la atención del paciente con infección en Urgencias. INFURG-SEMES (Grupo de trabajo de Infecciones de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) are serious complications of myelosuppressive chemotherapy and present a considerable burden to patients with cancer. Febrile neutropenia is associated with increased risks of infection and hospitalization, a particular concern during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Oncology nurses and advanced practice providers (APPs; including nurse practitioners, physician assistants, advanced practice nurses, and pharmacists) play a vital role in the management of patients with cancer and the prevention of infections.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unveiling unexpected adverse events: post-marketing safety surveillance of gilteritinib and midostaurin from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting database.

Ther Adv Drug Saf

January 2025

Department of Pharmacy, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 10 Changjiang Branch Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400042, China.

Background: Gilteritinib and midostaurin are FLT3 inhibitors that have made significant progress in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. However, their real-world safety profile in a large sample population is incomplete.

Objectives: We aimed to provide a pharmacovigilance study of the adverse events (AEs) associated with gilteritinib and midostaurin through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To assess the incidence of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, documented infection with neutropenia and fever associated with early-stage breast cancer (BC) in a real-life setting.

Methods: A retrospective study that includes 88 women with BC who received a first dose of Epirubicin plus Cyclophosphamide with or without 5-Fluorouracil, in the county hospital of Ryhov, Sweden. The patients were included continuously from May 2017 to November 2020 and were ≥18 years old.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!