Background: An extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is a powerful tool for femoral component revision. There is limited evidence that directly supports its use in the setting of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Cerclage fixation raises the theoretical concern for persistent infection.

Methods: Our institutional database included 76 ETOs for revision hip arthroplasty between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2019. The cohort was divided based on indication for femoral component revision: PJI versus aseptic revision. The PJI group was subdivided based on second-stage exchange versus retention of initial cerclage fixation. Operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, and rate of repeat revision surgery were evaluated.

Results: Forty-nine patients (64%) underwent revision for PJI and 27 patients (36%) underwent aseptic revision. There was no significant difference in operative times (P = .082), postoperative complications (P = .258), or rate of repeat revision surgery (P = .322) between groups. Of the 49 patients in the PJI group, 40 (82%) retained cerclage fixation while 9 (18%) had cerclage exchange. Cerclage exchange did not significantly impact operative time (P = .758), blood loss (P = .498), rate of repeat revision surgery (P = .302), or postoperative complications (P = .253) including infection (P = .639).

Conclusion: An ETO remains a powerful tool for femoral component removal, even in the presence of a PJI. A multi-institutional investigation would be required to validate observed trends toward better infection control with cerclage exchange. Cerclage exchange did not appear to increase operative time, blood loss, or postoperative complication rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167626PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.041DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cerclage fixation
16
cerclage exchange
16
femoral component
12
revision pji
12
operative time
12
blood loss
12
rate repeat
12
repeat revision
12
revision surgery
12
revision
10

Similar Publications

Background: Patellar fractures present challenges in treatment, with traditional methods often leading to complications such as loss of reduction and implant failure. This study aimed to compare a novel suture fixation technique with the traditional tension band method using finite element analysis.

Methods: CT images of a healthy 35-year-old male were used to construct 3D patellar models.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the long-term results of THA patients who received a cementless short stem regarding clinical outcomes, bone changes, complications, and incidence of femoral revision.

Methods: A retrospective evaluation of the first 100 THA employing a type 2B cementless stem (Mini hip stem, Corin, Cirencester, United Kingdom) by the same surgeon at one institution. We only include patients with 18 years or more, and with a minimum follow up of 8 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

 To determine the incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures during the operation in primary hip arthroplasties and correlate them with the inherent risk factors associated with patients, implants, and the diagnosis of coxarthrosis and/or femoral neck fractures.  Cross-sectional study, with retrospective analysis of medical records and image exams of patients operated between 2014 and 2019. The variables analyzed followed those proposed by the world literature, namely: age, sex, Dorr index, surgical indication, Vancouver classification, location, type of fixation (cemented or non-cemented), implant model used, intraoperative diagnosis, and corresponding treatment approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: 1 mm cerclage cables have been introduced that can be placed under plates and hold reduction of periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Their utilization remains controversial due to the risk of nonunion secondary to periosteal stripping associated for their application. We compared surgical outcomes in patients with THA PPFFx treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and cables vs patients with PPFFx treated with ORIF without cables.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to measure the biomechanical stability of two fixation methods (suture button and suture tape cerclage) for anterior glenoid bone grafts, comparing hand tensioning to device tensioning.
  • - Researchers tested artificial bone blocks and recorded how much displacement occurred under various forces while using a cyclic loading protocol.
  • - Results showed that device tensioning provided significantly better stability than hand tensioning for both methods, particularly at forces over 100 N, with suture buttons performing better than suture tape at higher loads.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!