Objective To compare the early clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)on single-segment lumbar stenosis with instability. Methods The patients who had single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with instability and were treated in our hospital from August 2020 to May 2021 were selected.According to the operation methods,they were classified into ULIF group and MIS-TLIF group.The operation duration,hospital stay after operation,perioperative blood loss (drainage volume 48 h after operation,total blood loss),creatine kinase,inflammatory cytokines (C-reactive protein,interleukin-6),D-dimer,and the incidence of lower-extremity venous thrombosis were compared between the two groups.The visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the two groups in 1 week,1 month,and 3 months after operation. Results The ULIF group had longer operation duration (<0.001) and shorter hospital stay after operation (=0.022)than the MIS-TLIF group.The drainage volume 48 h after operation and total blood loss in ULIF group were lower than those in MIS-TLIF group (all <0.001).The levels of creatine kinase (all <0.001),C-reactive protein (<0.001,=0.002),and interleukin-6 (=0.003,<0.001) in ULIF group were lower than those in MIS-TLIF group on the 1st and 3rd day after operation.However,the D-dimer in ULIF group was insignificantly different from that in MIS-TLIF group on the 1st and 3rd day after operation (=0.117,=0.683).Lower-extremity venous thrombosis occurred in neither group.The score of visual analogue scale showed no significant difference between the two groups 1 week,1 month,and 3 months after operation (=0.447,=0.578,=0.538),so did the Oswestry disability index (=0.832,=0.797,=0.619). Conclusion ULIF shows similar clinical effect on single-segment lumbar stenosis with instability to MIS-TLIF,which features less bleeding,mild inflammation,mild muscle injury,but long operation duration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.14549 | DOI Listing |
Eur Spine J
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the incidence of radiological adjacent segment disease (R-ASD) at L3/4 between patients with L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) who underwent L4/5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and those who underwent microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach (MBDU) at L4/5. Our ultimate goal was to distinguish the course of natural lumbar degeneration from fusion-related degeneration while eliminating L4/5 decompression as a confounder.
Methods: Ninety patients with L4/5 DS who underwent L4/5 PLIF (n = 53) or MBDU (n = 37) and were followed for at least 5 years were retrospectively analyzed.
Orthop Surg
January 2025
Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Objectives: The advent of O-arm navigation optimized the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedure, allowing the operator to simultaneously perform OLIF and percutaneous posterior pedicle screw implantation without patient position change, thus improving the fluency and accuracy of the OLIF procedure (called as OLIF360). Nevertheless, a consensus regarding its suitability for patients with severe spinal stenosis remains elusive. This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of OLIF360 and its imaging changes in severe lumbar spinal stenosis cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Bioeng Biotechnol
January 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Background: Currently, some novel rods with lower elastic modulus have the potential as alternatives to traditional titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion. However, how the elastic modulus of the rod (rod-E) influences the biomechanical performance of lumbar interbody fusion remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the quantitative relationships between rod-E and the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJBJS Essent Surg Tech
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroscience and Spine, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Background: Prone transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (PTP) is a newer technique to treat various spinal disc pathologies. PTP is a variation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) that is performed with the patient prone rather than in the lateral decubitus position. This approach offers similar benefits of lateral spinal surgery, which include less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery compared with traditional open spine surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop Sci
January 2025
Department of Spine Surgery, Anshun People's Hospital, Anshun, China. Electronic address:
Background: Degenerative lumbar diseases (DLDs) often have significant impacts on patients' quality of life, particularly when cage retropulsion (CR) occurs following lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the risk factors associated with CR after LIF.
Methods: We retrieved literatures analyzing the risk factors associated with CR following LIF from seven databases.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!