Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study compared different methods for cleaning the sealer-contaminated access cavity of upper incisors. After standard endodontic access, the canals of 50 extracted maxillary incisors were chemomechanically prepared and obturated with gutta-percha and epoxy resin sealer. Teeth were randomly assigned to one of five different pulp chamber cleaning protocols (n = 10): air/water spray, ethanol-saturated cotton pellet (CP), ethanol-saturated microbrush reaching the root filling (MB), MB + air polishing (PROPHYflex; KaVo), or MB + etching with 37% phosphoric acid. Each tooth was split and the sealer-covered area of the pulp chamber was determined on images taken before and after cleaning using image analysis software. The sealer-covered area was compared across groups using one-way ANOVA. Greatest mean sealer-covered area reduction was observed for MB + etching (98.0%), MB + air polishing (95.2%), and MB alone (92.8%), yielding a significantly higher sealer-covered area reduction than after air/water spray (8.3%) and ethanol-saturated cotton pellet (53.4%). The upper incisor access cavity is best cleaned with an ethanol-saturated microbrush reaching up to the root filling, followed by air/water spraying and etching. The use of cotton pellets should be discouraged.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12894 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!